I LOVE KERRI AND THINK SHE'S ALWAYS RIGHT NO MATTER WHAT!

Also wanted to add that I think Kerri is SUPER sweet! I met her briefly at the NW luncheon and anyone who wears blue manolos on their wedding day is A-Okay in my book

HAHAHA!!! you guys are super!!! xoxoxox

Not only am I bully but..... this lying fool actually wrote that she had to console brides that I bullied throughout the years!!! haha!! I get a great kick out of this!!

Allegra is right... the whole thing is so laughable. I never bully anyone... but that doesn't mean I'm not afraid to state what I think. i don't ever degrade anyone... i didn't call anyone a name.... i didn't tell people they get off at the funnyfarm bus stop I didn't attack anyone. Please! I still stand by it..... if you dislike the rules sooooo much that you attempt to wage a war against the whole site.... then just leave! and please do let the door hit your azz on the way out... this way we know you're gone!! IDK call me insane but if I didn't like something enough to cause drama over it.... i don't think i'd even want to be a part of it and I'd just want out. They need to get a grip with their 300 posts and thinking they are going to change the world!! Learn to do a search and ye shall learn this battle has already occurred in many years past, with the same outcome.

Angela - thank you!!!! I only got to read what you wrote once.... and by that point i was skimming through because the other long long long rambling almost incoherent messages were just sounding a lot like BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH to me. but thank you anyway!!! Sure did make for an interesting Sunday night! haha!!!

---

Posted by AugustBridein09

Also wanted to add that I think Kerri is SUPER sweet! I met her briefly at the NW luncheon and anyone who wears blue manolos on their wedding day is A-Okay in my book

---

---

Posted by alli3131

---

Posted by chicky724

Boooo it's gone... I knew I should have gone into work late so I could have read the whole thing!

---

it got pulled just before 9am,........i was in the middle of reading it

---

I later learned that you were stating the same exact points Angela and I were saying on other earlier posts. I didn't even see other posts until late last night when someone sent them to me.

FYI - there were some Juhgail type things going on. That's what I think she was doing wrong. It wasn't Juhgail though.... just for the record.

---

Posted by Tomlaur0808

---

Posted by MrsDrinkh20

I haev no clue who it is...i live in a bubble.

---

me too

---

the only speculation we have is someone Allegra pointed out at the end of it.

But who knows. It could have even been one of those newbies with the 300 posts waging a war.

I am so confused right now

---

Posted by coldasice217

I am so confused right now

---

It's better this way ... just a whole bunch of unnecessary drama.

All I know is that I hope the OP got to see my post about the correct 'termage' between 'liable' & 'libel' - people shouldnt point fingers about words when they arent using them correctly themselves! NUFF SAID!

---

Posted by Tomlaur0808

All I know is that I hope the OP got to see my post about the correct 'termage' between 'liable' & 'libel' - people shouldnt point fingers about words when they arent using them correctly themselves! NUFF SAID!

---

I sure hope so too!! that was hysterical!!!
Just incase they didn't....
just FYI - the term liable is correct.

li•a•ble –adjective
1. legally responsible: You are liable for the damage caused by your action.

'Because it can be viewed as liable' - it is being implied that YOU are liable when you use the word 'warning' in a post - that makes you liable or legally responsible, and the vendor can sue you for 'libel' which is 'defamation by written or printed words, pictures, or in any form other than by spoken words or gestures.'

Hope this clears this up for you.


yes... yes I am a sick girl! haha!! it was one of the very very few posts I saved from the thread.

---

Posted by julesrbf

---

Posted by coldasice217

I am so confused right now

---

It's better this way ... just a whole bunch of unnecessary drama.

---

bah hahaha! indeed it is better this way.

---

Posted by KerriJohnS

---

Posted by julesrbf

---

Posted by coldasice217

I am so confused right now

---

It's better this way ... just a whole bunch of unnecessary drama.

---

bah hahaha! indeed it is better this way.

---

Well whatever it is I got your back!

---

Posted by KerriJohnS

---

Posted by Tomlaur0808

All I know is that I hope the OP got to see my post about the correct 'termage' between 'liable' & 'libel' - people shouldnt point fingers about words when they arent using them correctly themselves! NUFF SAID!

---

I sure hope so too!! that was hysterical!!!
Just incase they didn't....
just FYI - the term liable is correct.

li•a•ble –adjective
1. legally responsible: You are liable for the damage caused by your action.

'Because it can be viewed as liable' - it is being implied that YOU are liable when you use the word 'warning' in a post - that makes you liable or legally responsible, and the vendor can sue you for 'libel' which is 'defamation by written or printed words, pictures, or in any form other than by spoken words or gestures.'

Hope this clears this up for you.


yes... yes I am a sick girl! haha!! it was one of the very very few posts I saved from the thread.

---

OMG this is why I love you Kerri!

Now im super mad i didnt read it. I am ALWAYS awesome at figuring out who it is!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I am the detective of these boarddssss