can anyone recommend a elegant but inexpensive hall that can accomodate less than 100 people?
Original post by jantany26
Thread views: 3,251
I will only be having 85 people. and we can only afford up to $5000 for the reception. can anyone give ideas of places that are beautiful, elegant but affordable to our price range? i would like to have the ceremony there also.
Kelly9904
Thread views: 3,251
Member since
Re: can anyone recommend a elegant but inexpensive hall that can accomodate less than 100 people?
Windows on the lake is in ronkonkoma I think their minimum might be more but they also own beach club estate which is supposed to be beautiful and is for more intimate weddings JodiJohn903 just got married there
jantany26
Thread views: 3,251
Member since
Re: can anyone recommend a elegant but inexpensive hall that can accomodate less than 100 people?
bumping
wacky
Thread views: 3,251
Member since
Re: can anyone recommend a elegant but inexpensive hall that can accomodate less than 100 people?
Try the Stewart Manor Country Club, on Salisbury Rd in Stewart Manor its in between New Hyde Park and Garden City
Re: can anyone recommend a elegant but inexpensive hall that can accomodate less than 100 people?
bumping
jenny2penny
Thread views: 3,251
Member since
Re: can anyone recommend a elegant but inexpensive hall that can accomodate less than 100 people?
I'd see if Stewart Manor Country Club, would be willing to lower minimum to 85/90 (usually is 100 minimum).
Watermills - bostonian room is 50 minimum, but 75 max. Astor I think was 100
Irishbride
Thread views: 3,251
Member since
Re: can anyone recommend a elegant but inexpensive hall that can accomodate less than 100 people?
We are having our reception at the Beach Club Estate on Lake Ronkonkoma. My min is 100 people. You can also get married there.
neen
Thread views: 3,251
Member since
Re: can anyone recommend a elegant but inexpensive hall that can accomodate less than 100 people?
Miller Place Inn, Meadow Club....
Barakabella
Thread views: 3,251
Member since
Re: can anyone recommend a elegant but inexpensive hall that can accomodate less than 100 people?
Coindre Hall is the biggest bargain of all--owned by the county so site fee is really low compared to other mansions like Oheka.
Scoop
Thread views: 3,251
Member since
Re: can anyone recommend a elegant but inexpensive hall that can accomodate less than 100 people?
Not sure of prices but I know these places accomodate smaller parties
The George Washington Manor The Strathmore Vanderbilt Country Club The Cottage House Caffe on the Green
jantany26
Thread views: 3,251
Member since
Re: can anyone recommend a elegant but inexpensive hall that can accomodate less than 100 people?
kathleenmarie
Thread views: 3,251
Member since
Re: can anyone recommend a elegant but inexpensive hall that can accomodate less than 100 people?
I second the East Wind. they they have three buidings for varieous size weddings. I had a friend who had her wedding there for about 75 people, and we are hoping to stay around 100
jennbaby
Thread views: 3,251
Member since
Re: can anyone recommend a elegant but inexpensive hall that can accomodate less than 100 people?
I LMAO every time I see someone write the Coral House is cheap Maybe on a Fri or Sun?? Jeez I paid Over $89 with tax & tip pp on a sat. night!!
aliasPook@aol.com
Thread views: 3,251
Member since
Re: can anyone recommend a elegant but inexpensive hall that can accomodate less than 100 people?
Durows of Glendale Roma View Villa Russo Stuart Thomas Manor
MayDay16
Thread views: 3,251
Member since
Re: can anyone recommend a elegant but inexpensive hall that can accomodate less than 100 people?
I would say Captain Bills in Bay Shore. The place is on the water the view is terrific and the food is good.
