Over the last month, FH and I have met with a ton of photographers and up until this point we had pretty much decided to go with Tom Paul. He was the first vendor we had seen so we didn't want to sign a contract without sizing up the competition. Well today, we meet with our last photographer, Artisan, and now we can't decide between the two. Prices are pretty much the same. With Tom Paul we'd get two photographers and 600-800 pics, but with Artisan we'd get one photographer and a lighting asistant and the same amount of pics. Both of their work is awesome. Tom Paul is holding the date until friday (we had seen him at the beginning of last month so our four weeks is up). Tom Paul is the nicest guy on the planet and I don't want to tell him that we're going with someone else. The other guy is really cool, but I don't have the same devotion to him just yet. Who should I go with?
jgl
Posted:
Member since
Re: Can't decide...
Seems like you feel better with TOm.. go with your gut!
Dana523
Posted:
Member since
Re: Can't decide...
Posted by jgl
Seems like you feel better with TOm.. go with your gut!
I agree!!!!
cherish83
Posted:
Member since
Re: Can't decide...
Posted by Dana523
Posted by jgl
Seems like you feel better with TOm.. go with your gut!
I agree!!!!
I agree too!
Tom and Mel
Posted:
Member since
Re: Can't decide...
i agree go with who you feel most comfortable with.
tdebe
Posted:
Member since
Re: Can't decide...
I like them both though as people, but I've talked to Tom Paul more which is why he's like my new friend. But what it comes down to is whether we should have the second photographer or a lighting assistant. Both will take the same amount of pictures either way. The Artisan photographer has been doing photography a lot longer and can easily take up to 1,000 pics by himself. I don't know which will be more important or how necessary lighting is.
