Post New Topic

Important - a vote regarding a new tax for home buyers

KarenG Posted:

Important - a vote regarding a new tax for home buyers

This November, a referendum is being placed before voters in the Town of Brookhaven - 'The Open Space Preservation Fund'. If it passes, the fund would authorize the Town to collect a 2% real estate transfer tax from buyers on properties above a $250,000 threshold.

That means that every dollar over $250,000 will be taxed at 2%! Since the average sale price in Suffolk is now up to $335K, almost all new home buyers will be hit with this tax.

As an example, let's consider the house for sale at $335K. 335K-250K=85K. $85K would be taxed at 2% which is $1700.

Now, $1700 may not seem like a lot of money to some people but for most of us who find it hard to come up with enough for the down payment + closing costs, another $2000 is a lot of cash!

The intent of the plan is good - to preserve our environment. But I think it is unfair for this burden to be placed upon the new home buyers. Why not have everyone pay?

Here is the link to the full press release on the town web site. If you disagree with this tax, then VOTE NO ON ELECTION DAY!


Preservation Fund Press Release
Meg9-20-02 Posted:

Re: Important - a vote regarding a new tax for home buyers

I was shocked when I heard about this! I put our names on the list of citizens agains this tax. Bad timing for us since we will close next February!!
Wendy Posted:

Re: Important - a vote regarding a new tax for home buyers

I read this, but I am wondering if it only applies to empty land and not to homes. It's not specific. I think you might want to clarify that before you vote no.

Edited to add that I read it again and think this only applies to land not to those purchasing an existing home. Again maybe I'm wrong but I would clarify it.
Karen H Posted:

Re: Important - a vote regarding a new tax for home buyers

Hi Wendy!!!

If it's what I heard about awhile back, it's on the sale of all properties, with the money earmarked to preserve open space by using it to purchase land for parks and preserves. Couldn't swear to it, but I think that's what I heard.

The objection that I heard at that time was that it put the tax burden only on those purchasing, not existing homeowners who would also benefit. Not that any new tax is good or welcome - they were just pointing out that it taxed only a specific few.
KarenG Posted:

Re: Important - a vote regarding a new tax for home buyers

Wendy - the 2% tax is on the sale of improved properties (with homes). The buyer pays the tax.

There is a separate rate and tax threshold for vacant land. (which I can not remember at the moment)

I was actually at the Town Board Meeting when Supervisor LaValle Explained it to the public.

KarenG Posted:

Another article that might help clarify - Newsday

Plan Tax Rivals in Brookhaven

Plan Taxes Rivals In Brookhaven
By Christian Murray
STAFF WRITER

October 13, 2003

A pitched battle is being waged between two old adversaries in the Town of Brookhaven - conservationists and builders - over a new tax on real estate transactions that could add thousands of dollars to the sale of homes.

At issue is Brookhaven's proposed community preservation fund, known as Proposition 1 on the Nov. 4 ballot, which aims to keep up to 39,000 acres of farmland, wetlands and shoreline out of the hands of developers.

If voters approve the proposition, the town plans to buy the land with funds it generates from a 2 percent sales tax on the sale of residential and commercial properties. Town officials say purchasers will pay the tax,which kicks in once a $250,000 threshold is reached. In practice, it means the buyer of a $400,000 house would pay an additional $3,000 in taxes, starting Jan. 1.

The tax is similar to one imposed in East End towns, which by most accounts has been successful at preserving land and was recently extended for another 10 years. But the Brookhaven tax is no shoo-in, and as the election nears, preservationists and developers are mobilizing to get their message out to constituents.

Louis Marcoccia, coordinator of the Brookhaven Citizens Against Higher Taxes, said home buyers who move to areas such as Selden, Centereach and Shirley have little to gain from the tax, since there is little open space in those areas for the town to buy. He says home owners in Eastern Brookhaven will benefit. 'We're going to do what is necessary to spread the word that this isn't fair.' Marcoccia said.

'It's unbelievable. Ridiculous,' said Maggie Hernandez, 41, of Selden, who is looking to spend $430,000 on a larger house in Selden or Center Moriches. 'We pay enough taxes as it is,' she said, without another $3,600 being tacked on. 'I will vote against it.'

Commercial real estate officials also are opposed because of the cost. For example, the buyer of a $20-million building would have to lay out $400,000 in cash, said Bob Wieboldt, executive vice president of the Long Island Builders Institute.

Late Friday, members of the development and real estate communities - through the Brookhaven Citizens Against Taxes - sought an injunction in State Supreme Court to change the wording on the ballot. A hearing is set for Friday.

'The ballot says that the buyer is responsible for the 2 percent tax,' said Steven Schlesinger, a Garden City lawyer who filed the application. 'But in many instances the seller would be on the hook,' such as when a buyer can't pay the tax or is a tax-exempt government or church.

Supporters of Proposition 1 such as state Sen. Kenneth LaValle (R-Port Jefferson) say that without a well-endowed fund, Brookhaven's natural environment might be in jeopardy. 'This fund will help generate a balance between development and land preservation,' LaValle said.

'People are on to developers,' said Richard Amper, executive director of the Long Island Pine Barrens Society. 'They know that they hurt them economically and environmentally,' he said. 'The cost of new schools, roads, police protection is more than new taxes. And then there is the traffic congestion.'

Real estate officials worry about the effect of the added costs on home sales. Lita Smith-Mines, a Commack real estate lawyer, said the existing 0.75 percent New York State mortgage tax, property taxes, escrow accounts, points and other fees can add 7 percent to the purchase price. For many buyers, she said, the new tax could be a deal breaker. 'Prospective buyers might look to buy houses in Smithtown, Huntington or New Jersey instead,' Smith-Mines said.

But the industry's fears are unfounded, said Inez Burbiglia, a Brookhaven Town spokeswoman. She said a similar fund created in the five East End towns in 1999 has had little impact on the real estate industry out east. More than 7,500 acres of land have been bought on the East End since 1999, records show. Also, proponents say, the transfer tax won't affect affordable housing, since it doesn't apply to houses sold below $250,000, or vacant land sold for less than $150,000.

The real estate and building industries have failed to garner the support of one major business group. 'I don't think that it will significantly hurt business,' said Matthew Crosson, president of the Long Island Association. 'It makes it more expensive, sure ... but open space attracts talent and people to an area.'

What Price For Open Space?

A controversial transfer tax proposal has pitted developers against conservationists in the Town of Brookhaven. Meanwhile, real estate professionals and prospective buyers and sellers are wondering how it will impact the market. Below is a look at 2003 median sales prices for homes in some Brookhaven communities and a look at how the new tax would impact a typical sale.

2003 Median Sales Prices Brookhaven Town

$275,000

Medford

$262,000

Manorville

$397,000

Selden

$265,000

Bellport:

$217,000

Miller Place

$382,500

Coram

$275,000

Port

Jefferson

$459,000

Mt. Sinai

$370,000

Setauket

$542,000

Centereach

$283,250

Lake

Ronkonkoma

$288,500

Closing the Deal

What it would cost to close a real estate transaction in the Town of Brookhaven with a proposed 2 percent transfer tax.

CLOSING COSTS:

Property taxes (about 9 months) $5,250

Mortgage tax $2,337

Private mortgage insurance $2,250*

Title insurance (buyer's policy) $1,864

Buyers attorney $1,000

Bank attorney $600

Home insurance $500

Title insurance (lender's policy) $431

Engineers report $400

Recording fees $340

Appraisal and credit report $325

Dept charges $300

Miscellaneous fees $200

ASSUMPTIONS

Selling price $350,000

Down payment $35,000 (10%)

Mortgage amount $315,000

Annual property taxes $7,000

PLUS ...

Community

Preservation Fund $2,000

Total closing costs $17,797

Total funds needed $52,797

(including down payment)

*Required on down payments of less than 20 percent. Rates vary, but on general average 0.007 percent of loan amount with first year's premium paid at closing.

SOURCES: Multiple Listing Service of Long Island, GE Mortgage Insurance
Copyright © 2003, Newsday, Inc.

Wendy Posted:

Re: Important - a vote regarding a new tax for home buyers

Thanks for the clarification. I couldn't tell from the article as it was written since all it kept talking about was land. I don't live in Brookhaven anymore but it stinks for those who are planning on purchasing a home there.

Perhaps I was confused. One of my sisters recently subdivided her 1 1/2 acre lot and she was told that she needed to sell it before a new tax on land sales took effect. She just went to closing so she is safe at least in that respect.
KarenG Posted:

Some good news - Court blocks Brookhaven 2% transfer tax vote

I have a subscription to Long Island Business News. I receive email updates daily and the following just popped into my inbox...

Meg, that petition you signed helped!!! THANKS!

Stay tuned!

******************

Flash Report

Court blocks Brookhaven 2% transfer tax vote
Oct. 21 2003 -- 04:36:38 PM EST


State Supreme Court Justice John J.J. Jones Tuesday annulled the Town of Brookhaven’s Proposition 1, a voter referendum on whether to allow the town to impose a 2 percent real estate transfer tax to fund the acquisition of open space.

The court granted a petition by Brookhaven Citizens Against Higher Taxes, a new Port Jefferson civic group, to strike the question from the Nov. 4 ballot, ruling that the planned wording on the question was “substantially misleading to voters as well as inaccurate.”

Jones said the question posed to voters stated incorrectly that the transfer tax would be paid by the buyer of a property. In fact, the law permitting the tax cites more than a dozen instances where the buyer would be exempt from the tax and the seller would have to pick up the tab.

Brookhaven officials were not available for comment, but others who have worked closely with them on the campaign to promote the tax, said they were all but certain to appeal.

Jones ruled that Proposition 1 “must be annulled, since there is insufficient time under [the law] to allow amendment of the proposition in time for the Nov. 4 election.”

If voters had approved the plan, the town expected to reap an estimated $330 million before the tax ended in 2025.

The town had planned to borrow against that income stream to begin a massive open space buying campaign in over the next few years, according to Richard Amper, executive director of the Long Island Pine Barrens Society.

Supporters of the tax claimed that the Brookhaven civic group was merely a front for the Long Island Builders Institute, an organization of residential builders that acknowledged giving it financial support.

Meg9-20-02 Posted:

Re: Important - a vote regarding a new tax for home buyers

Thanks Karen!! Great news for me!!!

Reply to this topic

Log in to reply or quote a post.