Ok...so just when i think i made a decision about a photographer.... i went to Patken today and I absolutely LOVED them. But I loved silverfox too! Any suggestions???? i don't know how to choose!!!!
CKJ906
Posted:
Member since
Re: Patken Vs. Silverfox
Patkin doesn't using a lighting assistant..I dont know if that matters to you, but they don't me 'they dont need light' and when i went to all 5 other photographers and i asked them they told me that is absolutly crazy who told me that.........so if you want shadow pictures they dont do it cause i asked..
LaurenluvsTJ
Posted:
Member since
Re: Patken Vs. Silverfox
I saw both of them and I would choose Silverfox, definitely. Something about Patken made me feel uncomfortable. Also they only have one photographer for the same amount of money.
MissingTheBGene
Posted:
Member since
Re: Patken Vs. Silverfox
I saw Patken, but only saw of Silverfox of when I went to see Starlight Express. I can't speak of Silverfox in detail, from what I saw did look great, and I decided not to go with Patken.
I guess my advice would be to go with the photographer you are more personable with and feel most comfortable. Was there anything between the two that made either one stand out more? Maybe that will help in the deciding factor. Good luck and let us know what you choose!
cmrka
Posted:
Member since
Re: Patken Vs. Silverfox
I used Silverfox in April and they were great!
leese
Posted:
Member since
Re: Patken Vs. Silverfox
I saw both of them.
The reason why I said no to Patken was because I wanted my proofs on a digital form, complete with the web page and everything. They didn't offer that. Everything had to be done by them, and I would rather have my shots in digital form to do what I want.
But if that doesn't bother you, I thought their work was good.
