Post New Topic

Prince Harry - NO!!!!!

SuzBride Posted:

Prince Harry - NO!!!!!



The girl in the picture's name is Natalie Pinkham. Harry's GF's name is Chelsea Davy. Hmmm....that could be a problem.

ETA: The more I look at this, the more I think it is photoshopped, but amusing none-the-less
itslaurie. Posted:

Re: Prince Harry - NO!!!!!



this guy is so outraged he can't even look!!

brooklynbridezilla Posted:

Re: Prince Harry - NO!!!!!

Those are some really funny looking boobies.
FallBride05 Posted:

Re: Prince Harry - NO!!!!!

The Queen must be SO proud!

mtdr1106 Posted:

Re: Prince Harry - NO!!!!!



grabbing boobies...
CLMon7906 Posted:

Re: Prince Harry - NO!!!!!



and in reality, it was probably something done as a joke...but tabloids only print what they want!
mtdr1106 Posted:

Re: Prince Harry - NO!!!!!


Posted by CLMon7906



and in reality, it was probably something done as a joke...but tabloids only print what they want!



he can joke around w/ my right boob anytime!

JanuaryBride06 Posted:

Re: Prince Harry - NO!!!!!



That's my man!
Blu-ize Posted:

Re: Prince Harry - NO!!!!!

Definitely photoshopped, but very amusing!

She doesn't look fazed...just drunk
KandE917 Posted:

Re: Prince Harry - NO!!!!!


Posted by itslaurie.



this guy is so outraged he can't even look!!




'This guy' is PRINCE WILLIAM! Harry's older brother!
mbtieds Posted:

Re: Prince Harry - NO!!!!!


Posted by itslaurie.



this guy is so outraged he can't even look!!




isnt that prince william?
BunnyBride Posted:

Re: Prince Harry - NO!!!!!

Yep..thats Willy...what a guy
N.Y.bride Posted:

Re: Prince Harry - NO!!!!!

I feel bad for the boys - just never left alone.
JPC1125 Posted:

Re: Prince Harry - NO!!!!!

1) that picture was taken 3 years ago...when he wasnt dating the new girlfriend

2) I feel bad for them...they can never live a fun, esxciting life as many young men in society do because supposedly they have to be held to a higher standard

3) 'May he who has not sinned, cast the first stone'

ETA- not directing this at you ladies but at newspapers/tabloids who have nothing better to report on
JanuaryBride06 Posted:

Re: Prince Harry - NO!!!!!

Okay, so I'm reading this morning that this picture was taken three years ago.
Because that makes the girlfriend calm down.
SuzBride Posted:

Re: Prince Harry - NO!!!!!


Posted by JPC1125

1) that picture was taken 3 years ago...when he wasnt dating the new girlfriend

2) I feel bad for them...they can never live a fun, esxciting life as many young men in society do because supposedly they have to be held to a higher standard

3) 'May he who has not sinned, cast the first stone'

ETA- not directing this at you ladies but at newspapers/tabloids who have nothing better to report on



We heart Harry on NWR - he is our unofficial mascot Yeah I thought it was old, they look much younger, but still amusing
SuzBride Posted:

Re: Prince Harry - NO!!!!!

Prince Harry was livid last night after stolen photographs showing him in an intimate clinch with a close female friend were published in a tabloid newspaper.

The pictures, showing the third-in-line-to-the-throne kissing and groping the breast of pretty Natalie Pinkham, 28, were allegedly taken from the home of the television presenter and sold to The Sun.

Under the headline 'Dirty Harry', the article suggested that the 'playboy' prince's behaviour would have deeply upset his girlfriend Chelsy Davy, who is currently at university in South Africa.

He and Miss Pinkham have been romantically linked in the past and were photographed partying together until 5am earlier this year. The snapshots also show Harry's casually-dressed brother, William, quaffing cocktails and chatting animatedly to several attractive female revellers.

In another, Harry can be seen flinging his arm affectionately around his brother's neck and grinning wildly while dishevelled William stares goggle-eyed into the camera.

Enquiries yesterday revealed, however, that the photographs were not taken this summer at louche upper class nightclub, Boujis, as suggested by the newspaper.

Instead they were snapped in September 2003 at Chelsea nightspot Purple during a private party to celebrate Miss Pinkham's 26th birthday - six months before Harry even met Zimbabwean-born Miss Davy.

Harry, 21, is furious that he has been forced to reassure his distraught girlfriend that there is nothing to the story and has demanded the newspaper publish an apology.

It is a particularly sensitive issue for the Prince as in recent weeks he has been the subject of three tabloid 'kiss and tells'.

Looking red-eyed and texting furiously on her mobile phone, Chelsy abandoned her university lectures yesterday morning and returned to her luxury home in an exclusive suburb of Cape Town where she remained for the rest of the day.

Miss Pinkham, who describes herself as 'angry and distressed', confirmed to the Mail that the photographs in question were taken with her camera.

But she insisted that the original pictures had been kept 'under lock and key' at her London flat and had no idea how they had come into the newspaper's possession.

'The pictures are personal and were never intended for publication,' her spokeswoman said.

'Natalie is both distressed and angry that somebody has somehow managed to make copies of her private photographs.

'She considers herself to be a friend of the Princes and they are aware that she would never do anything to embarrass them.'

She has chosen not to report the matter to police to avoid further embarrasment to the princes. There is no suggestion, however, that The Sun printed the photographs knowing they may have been stolen or taken on Miss Pinkham's camera....more below at the source...
JanuaryBride06 Posted:

Re: Prince Harry - NO!!!!!

After I read this sentence:
'The snapshots also show Harry's casually-dressed brother, William, quaffing cocktails and chatting animatedly to several attractive female revellers.'

I couldn't concentrate on the rest of the article.
QUAFFING?
SuzBride Posted:

Re: Prince Harry - NO!!!!!

Hahaha!

I like how all the other Harry links pop up in the related links section - clearly very useful

Reply to this topic

Log in to reply or quote a post.