Question for LIW - Vendor Selection

---

Posted by samsbride
I think it would be great if we could even put a numerical rating (1-5) across a few categories (customer service, end product delivery, value, etc) I know these are all subjective but aren't we on here for others opinions??? I think this is a dream though - vendors would never allow it. The current system works too well for vendors. It's just not ideal for us brides.

---

Definitely subjective but I think it's an awesome idea. Could be more helpful - if used honestly - than 'A++++++++++++++++++++++'.

---

Posted by september2004

well, someone can set the bar and if it's low it's low. of course not everyone is going to be happy all the time, vendors are human too. however, if there is a proven track record here of poor service, i personally would like to know some type of filter exists and be informed as to how vendors are selected and rated.

just want to 'know the rules'

a bride will have her access taken away if she stirs up too much trouble, no?

---

I understand what you are saying. But I think that's where we need to decide for ourselves.

I can't imagine how much trouble someone has to stir up to get banned from LIW. It must be tons

---

Posted by Maribelle7777

---

Posted by minniebride14

Very good idea, and it makes total sense. Let the experience tell the story of the vendor - ALL THE EXPERIENCES, both good and bad.

On another note, as far as 'screening' potential (or existing vendors), there SHOULD be some investigating done, in order to provide the brides on here with only the best vendor selections - in every aspect of the word. As well, the vendors should be 'reviewed/investigated' each time they are up for renewal. I'm SURE that would weed out the good and the problematic. It would protect the site as well.

But, that's common sense...

---

I don't think that should have to be done. What one thinks is a reputable vendor, another person may not. I think that any vendor that pays, should be allowed to advertise. And it should be up to the individual person to decide if they are the best vendor for their needs.

---

I strongly disagree. I was referring to a determination on allowing a vendor to advertise based on FACT. I'm not talking about an opinion of a vendor or hearsay being a determining factor. I'm talking about FACTS, based on poor performance, unethical business practice and experience with the said vendor - not just 'I don't like So and So'... I believe it's in the best interest of the site AND the brides to be, to have said vendor's background, work experience and record looked into before the vendor is permitted to advertise for obvious reasons. Brides pay a lot of money to use vendors for their wedding, and they should be apprised of EVERYTHING about a potential vendor choice.

But, AGAIN, that's just my opinion - BASED ON EXPERIENCE...

---

Posted by Jordan

---

Posted by samsbride
I think it would be great if we could even put a numerical rating (1-5) across a few categories (customer service, end product delivery, value, etc) I know these are all subjective but aren't we on here for others opinions??? I think this is a dream though - vendors would never allow it. The current system works too well for vendors. It's just not ideal for us brides.

---

Definitely subjective but I think it's an awesome idea. Could be more helpful - if used honestly - than 'A++++++++++++++++++++++'.

---

There is a vendor rating section you can link from the home page. It only allows you to rate LIW vendors on a scale of 1 - 10 overall and has space for you to clarify your rating.

I added my ratings a few weeks ago and they were not all A++++++ or 10's.