the centerpeice will be a high centerpeice with a gold S shape cabrella (is that what you call the thing that holds the flowers?)
Table numbers will be in gold glitter frames
I was concerned the tablecloth could use a lil jazz
So i been debating for a while... gold satin runners or leave the table as is?
QueensNYC
Posted:
Member since
Runners or No Runners
That's so funny, we are having similar dilemmas, lol. I have been thinking about since the springtime and I'm still trying to find something ready made, affordable and longer than standard 108 inches for runners.
Chels
Posted:
Member since
Re: Runners or No Runners
Posted by QueensNYC
That's so funny, we are having similar dilemmas, lol. I have been thinking about since the springtime and I'm still trying to find something ready made, affordable and longer than standard 108 inches for runners.
I have been debating on these forever. I was originally going to buy sequin ones but it would cost almost 100 bucks. I found the satin ones on ebay for like 25 bucks for a lot of 10 (tons of choices on ebay and cheaper) but I just dont want overkill...
Double check if you need longer than 108. I thought I did too but the finalist told me they bustle the tables and if it is to long its harder to bustle.
I think you should leave it without the runners.. I'm assuming your tables are round.. The only way I would do table runners is if you had long rectangular tables that you were setting up family style
Chels
Posted:
Member since
Re: Runners or No Runners
bump
mab30
Posted:
Member since
Runners or No Runners
I vote for runners! Love sequined runners but they're SO expensive! I think they'll give your tables a nice, cohesive look :) But I do agree, sometimes they look silly on round tables if they're too thin.
