something I think you should read about john kerry--LONG
Original post by elyssa222
Regardless of your political affiliations, many have been incensed at the accusations that John Kerry made about the conduct of those he said he served with in Viet Nam when he testified before the Senate many years ago. Those men who served with him are now finally speaking out. Comments below.
'We resent very deeply the false war crimes charges he made coming back from Vietnam in 1971 and repeated in the book 'Tour of Duty.' We think those cast an aspersion on all those living and dead, from our unit and other units in Vietnam. We think that he knew he was lying when he made the charges, and we think that they're unsupportable. We intend to bring the truth about that to the American people.
We believe, based on our experience with him, that he is totally unfit to be the Commander-in-Chief.'
-- John O'Neill, spokesman, Swift Boat Veterans for Truth .
'I do not believe John Kerry is fit to be Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces of the United States. This is not a political issue. It is a matter of his judgment, truthfulness, reliability, loyalty and trust -- all absolute tenets of command. His biography, 'Tour of Duty,' by Douglas Brinkley, is replete with gross exaggerations, distortions of fact, contradictions and slanderous lies. His contempt for the military and authority is evident by even a most casual review of this biography. He arrived in-country with a strong anti-Vietnam War bias and a self-serving determination to build a foundation for his political future. He was aggressive, but vain and prone to impulsive judgment, often with disregard for specific tactical assignments. He was a 'loose cannon.' In an abbreviated tour of four months and 12 days, and with his specious medals secure, Lt.(jg) Kerry bugged out and began his infamous betrayal of all United States forces in the! ! Vietnam War. That included our soldiers, our marines, our sailors, our coast guardsmen, our airmen, and our POWs. His leadership within the so-called Vietnam Veterans Against the War and testimony before Congress in 1971 charging us with unspeakable atrocities remain an undocumented but nevertheless meticulous stain on the men and women who honorably stayed the course. Senator Kerry is not fit for command.'
-- Rear Admiral Roy Hoffman, USN (retired), chairman, Swift Boat Veterans for Truth .
'During Lt.(jg) Kerry's tour, he was under my command for two or three specific operations, before his rapid exit. Trust, loyalty and judgment are the key, operative words. His turncoat performance in 1971 in his grubby shirt and his medal-tossing escapade, coupled with his slanderous lines in the recent book portraying us that served, including all POWs and MIAs, as murderous war criminals, I believe, will have a lasting effect on all military veterans and their families.
Kerry would be described as devious, self-absorbing, manipulative, disdain for authority, disruptive, but the most common phrase that you'd hear is 'requires constant supervision.''
-- Captain Charles Plumly, USN (retired) .
'Thirty-five years ago, many of us fell silent when we came back to the stain of sewage that Mr. Kerry had thrown on us, and all of our colleagues who served over there. I don't intend to be silent today or ever again. Our young men and women who are serving deserve no less.'
-- Andrew Horne .
'In my specific, personal experience in both coastal and river patrols over a 12-month period, I never once saw or heard anything remotely resembling the atrocities described by Senator Kerry. If I had, it would have been my obligation to report them in writing to a higher authority, and I would certainly have done that. If Senator Kerry actually witnessed or participated in these atrocities or, as he described them, 'war crimes,' he was obligated to report them. That he did not until later when it suited his political purposes strikes me as opportunism of the worst kind. That he would malign my service and that of his fellow sailors with no regard for the truth makes him totally unqualified to serve as Commander-in-Chief.'
-- Jeffrey Wainscott .
'I signed that letter because I, too felt a deep sense of betrayal that someone who took the same oath of loyalty as I did as an officer in the United States Navy would abandon his group here (points to group photo) to join this group here (points to VVAW protest photo), and come home and attempt to rally the American public against the effort that this group was so valiantly pursuing.
It is a fact that in the entire Vietnam War we did not lose one major battle. We lost the war at home ... and at home, John Kerry was the Field General.'
-- Robert Elder .
'My daughters and my wife have read portions of the book 'Tour of Duty.' They wanted to know if I took part in the atrocities described. I do not believe the things that are described happened.
Let me give you an example. In Brinkley's book, on pages 170 to 171, about something called the 'Bo De massacre' on November 24th of 1968... In Kerry's description of the engagement, first he claimed there were 17 servicemen that were wounded. Three of us were wounded. I was the first...'
-- Joseph Ponder .
'While in Cam Rahn Bay, he trained on several 24-hour indoctrination missions, and one special skimmer operation with my most senior and trusted Lieutenant. The briefing from some members of that crew the morning after revealed that they had not received any enemy fire, and yet Lt.(jg) Kerry informed me of a wound -- he showed me a scratch on his arm and a piece of shrapnel in his hand that appeared to be from one of our own M-79s. It was later reported to me that Lt.(jg) Kerry had fired an M-79, and it had exploded off the adjacent shoreline. I do not recall being advised of any medical treatment, and probably said something like 'Forget it.' He later received a Purple Heart for that scratch, and I have no information as to how or whom.
Lt.(jg) Kerry was allowed to return to the good old USA after 4 months and a few days in-country, and then he proceeded to betray his former shipmates, calling them criminals who were committing atrocities. Today we are here to tell you that just the opposite is true. Our rules of engagement were quite strict, and the officers and men of Swift often did not even return fire when they were under fire if there was a possibility that innocent people -- fishermen, in a lot of cases -- might be hurt or injured. The rules and the good intentions of the men increased the possibility that we might take friendly casualties.'
-- Commander Grant Hibbard, USN (retired) .
'Lt. Kerry returned home from the war to make some outrageous statements and allegations... of numerous criminal acts in violation of the law of war were cited by Kerry, disparaging those who had fought with honor in that conflict. Had war crimes been committed by US forces in Vietnam? Yes, but such acts were few and far between. Yet Lt. Kerry have numerous speeches and testimony before Congress inappropriately leading his audiences to believe that what was only an anomaly in the conduct of America's fighting men was an epidemic. Furthermore, he suggested that they were being encouraged to violated the law of war by those within the chain of command.
Very specific orders, on file at the Vietnam archives at Texas Tech University, were issued by my father [Admiral Elmo Zumwalt] and others in his chain of command instructing subordinates to act responsibly in preserving the life and property of Vietnamese civilians.'
-- Lt. Col. James Zumwalt, USMC (retired) .
'We look at Vietnam... after all these years it is still languishing in isolated poverty and helplessness and tyranny. This is John Kerry's legacy. I deeply resent John Kerry's using his Swift boat experience, and his betrayal of those who fought there as a stepping-stone to his political ambitions.'
-- Barnard Wolff .
'In a whole year that I spent patrolling, I didn't see anything like a war crime, an atrocity, anything like that. Time and again I saw American fighting men put themselves in graver danger trying to avoid... collateral damage.
When John Kerry returned to the country, he was sworn in front of Congress. And then he told my family -- my parents, my sister, my brother, my neighbors -- he told everyone I knew and everyone I'd ever know that I and my comrades had committed unspeakable atrocities.'
-- David Wallace .
'I served with these guys. I went on missions with them, and these men served honorably. Up and down the chain of command there was no acquiescence to atrocities. It was not condoned, it did not happen, and it was not reported to me verbally or in writing by any of these men including Lt.(jg) Kerry.
In 1971, '72, for almost 18 months, he stood before the television audiences and claimed that the 500,000 men and women in Vietnam, and in combat, were all villains -- there were no heroes. In 2004, one hero from the Vietnam War has appeared, running for President of the United States and Commander-in-Chief. It just galls one to think about it.'
-- Captain George Elliott, USN (retired) .
'During the Vietnam War I was Task Force Commander at An Thoi, and my tour of duty was 13 months, from the end of Tet to the beginning of the Vietnamization of the Navy units.
Now when I went there right after Tet, I was restricted in my movements. I couldn't go much of anyplace because the Vietcong controlled most of the area. When I left, I could go anywhere I wanted, just about. Commerce was booming, the buses were running, trucks were going, the waterways were filled with sampans with goods going to market, but yet in Kerry's biography he says that our operations were a complete failure. He also mentions a formal conference with me, to try to get more air cover and so on. That conference never happened...'
-- Captain Adrian Lonsdale, USCG (retired).
'I was in An Thoi from June of '68 to June of '69, covering the whole period that John Kerry was there. I operated in every river, in every canal, and every off-shore patrol area in the 4th Corps area, from Cambodia all the way around to the Bo De River. I never saw, even heard of all of these so-called atrocities and things that we were supposed to have done.
This is not true. We're not standing for it. We want to set the record straight.'
-- William Shumadine.
'In 1971, when John Kerry spoke out to America, labeling all Vietnam veterans as thugs and murderers, I was shocked and almost brought to my knees, because even though I had served at the same time and same unit, I had never witnessed or participated in any of the events that the Senator had accused us of. I strongly believe that the statements made by the Senator were not only false and inaccurate, but extremely harmful to the United States' efforts in Southeast Asia and the rest of the world. Tragically, some veterans, scorned by the antiwar movement and their allies, retreated to a life of despair and suicide. Two of my crewmates were among them. For that there is no forgiveness. '
-- Richard O'Meara .
'My name is Steve Gardner. I served in 1966 and 1967 on my first tour of duty in Vietnam on Swift boats, and I did my second tour in '68 and '69, involved with John Kerry in the last 2 1/2 months of my tour. The John Kerry that I know is not the John Kerry that everybody else is portraying. I served alongside him and behind him, five feet away from him in a gun tub, and watched as he made indecisive moves with our boat, put our boats in jeopardy, put our crews in jeopardy... if a man like that can't handle that 6-man crew boat, how can you expect him to be our Commander-in-Chief?'
-- Steven Gardner .
'I served in Vietnam as a boat officer from June of 1968 to July of 1969. My service was three months in Coastal Division 13 out of Cat Lo, and nine months with Coastal Division 11 based in An Thoi. John Kerry was in An Thoi the same time I was. I'm here today to express the anger I have harbored for over 33 years, about being accused with my fellow shipmates of war atrocities.
All I can say is when I leave here today, I'm going down to the Wall to tell my two crew members it's not true, and that they and the other 49 Swiftees who are on the Wall were then and are still now the best.'
-- Robert Brant .
'I never saw, heard of, or participated in any Swift boat crews killing cattle, poisoning crops, or raping and killing civilians as charged by John Kerry, both in his book and in public statements. Since we both operated at the same time, in the same general area, and on the same missions under the same commanders, it is hard to believe his claims of atrocities and poor planning of Sea Lord missions.
I signed this letter because I feel that he used Swift boat sailors to proclaim his antiwar statements after the war, and now he uses the same Swift boat sailors to support his claims of being a war hero. He cannot have it both ways, and we are here to ask for full disclosure of the proof of his claims.'
-- James Steffes
heidla
Posted:
Member since
Re: something I think you should read about john kerry--LONG
Posted by verdila
Posted by heidla
Well, I first have to say that 4 months is a lot longer then I have spent in any war. I would think that 4 months during war probably feels just as horrible as four months in hell. I think to trivialize over the amount of time someone spent in a war is alittle misguided.
I think that it was actually made a part of his campign for several reasons.
1. The war we are fighting in Iraq has been said to be the 'next Vietnam'.
2. The current President did not serve in Vietnam and it is questioned as to where he actually was during this period.
3. Kerry's service was going to come into question because he came home and protested the war.
4. I think it is also an issue because people right now want a strong leader and Kerry's service helps bolster( or is meant to) his image in that way.
It was not an issue in Dole's campaign because the country was not at war. It was also not made an issue by the other team beacause Clinton never served at all.
I am not misguided at all - I know 4 mos is alot more than some people served, but I just find it a little funny that they are making this huge deal out of it when it was over 30 yrs ago - not to mention that he did come back from war and pretty much neglected his fellow soldiers there when he got to Senate.... in his democratic convention speech he flip flops all over the place - saying he will be tougher on terrorism than Bush, but then in the same breath, he will not bring us to an unjustified war, bla, bla. I think he is capitalizing on his 4 month service in war but its sort of funny because there are alot of Vietnam vets who dont like him at all for what he did 30 yrs ago - alot of that is true....look at his record.
Just because we werent in war at the time doesnt mean that Dole didnt need to bring to his campaign the fact that he was a WW2 war hero - he just didnt want to capitalize on it like Kerry is doing.
4. I think it is also an issue because people right now want a strong leader and Kerry's service helps bolster( or is meant to) his image in that way.
OK - he served 4 mos and got 3 purple hearts that he CONSTANTLY refers to (one for getting shot in the *** I think) and then came back and led the country against the war in Vietnam, pretty much making the war what it became here at home, a f'ng mess - thats the kind of man you want to lead our troops? Interesting.
I am not a Bush lover either but I think that both of these candidates are liars and its like choosing the lesser of two evils. Obviously, on LI weddings there are more Kerry supporters so anybody who challenges him is going to say they are misguided or what not, but I am just trying to present another side of the coin. Not to mention that if Kerry is elected, stock market is goign to tank again and taxes will get higher. He is also in favor or bringing back the marriage penalty tax.
Like I said, I am just trying to present another point of view than the prevailing one on LIW.
And for some people concerned with their livelihoods - small businesses. This is very true: (one of my family members is a small bus owner and is very scared at what will happen to his business if Kerry gets elected)
Kerry served five months in from what I have heard described as Hell. He saw things and did things that I can not imagine and then came home and spoke out about the atrocities. Yes, that will make alot of people not like you. Nobody is arguing that everyone that served in the Military with him liked him, but most that actually served under him appreciate his leadership and support his actions after he came home. I appreciate that he had the guts to come home and speak out about his experience knowing that it was not going to make him popular with everyone else.
I think that you can be tougher on terrorism and not lead our troops into an war. If Bush really wanted to be tougher on Terrorism by sending our troops to war then he could have at least sent them to a country that we know harbors terrorists. He could have finished what was started in Afghanistan. Or better yet, he could allocate more money for homeland security to those cities that are obviously at a higher risk. Why is it that people in Iowa get more Homeland Security Funds then the people of New York? DC? LA?
I know politicians lie. I always go to the polls feeling as if I am choosing the person that I think will screw things up the least. I don't think that everyone who supports Bush is misguided. I said that I think that when people trivialize the amount of time that a man put his life on the line for his country is misguided. One day is more then most of us have spent (myasmom excluded) . I also come from a family with a long history in the military and so I get defensive.
marymoon
Posted:
Member since
Re: something I think you should read about john kerry--LONG
Read my other post abut how one of the veterans who backed these attakcs i nt renouncing them
kptoys
Posted:
Member since
Re: something I think you should read about john kerry--LONG
There is a commercial put out about this.
I hope the link still works cause J Kerry was trying his darndest to get it banned from TV
www.swiftvets.com
myasmom
Posted:
Member since
Re: something I think you should read about john kerry--LONG
Well I think that you will see some who take back what they say about Kerry and those who do not. From reading the comments that Marymoon posted sounds like remorse of somesort perhaps realizing that that vet does not want to be in the hotseat for speaking against one of his own..kinda like Kerry ironically.
marymoon
Posted:
Member since
Re: something I think you should read about john kerry--LONG
I think criticizing John Kerry for protesting the war and saying he 'turned his back' on anyone is ludicrous. NO ONE with half a brain is going to tell you that the Vietnam 'police action' was a good idea. NO ONE. If they do, I really just can't imagine that they're sane or smart or have all of the facts. Aside from the thousands who were killed in Vietnam, I personally KNOW people whose lives have been destroyed by it. Cousins who now have a disability, or who literally went crazy, who have serious problems from agent orange, etc. This is excluding all of the damage and abuse brought upon the vietnamese people. Everyone's entitled to his or her opinion, but to me, nothing it more clear than the fact that it was a big mistake and a stain on our nations's history.
In NO way does this mean that anyone who served during that time was bad or need be criticizeed (unless they personally did something bad). They went there, whehter voluntarily or not, and they did their best to serve and protect our nation. They were brave and honorable, even if the mission was not.
Even if you diagree and think Vietnam was fine and dandy, I don't think it's fair to cirticize someoen who went to war voluntarily, participated in it, and cma ehome and had the openness of mind to declare that it was not so hot. Even though he only spent 4 months there, 4 months in 'hell' is a long time. ANd for those of you who have been on active duty or have loved ones or spouses who have, you know how long 4 months can be. It's about 3 months and 29 days longer than I'd survive in a compat situation, I can tell you that much.
Bride626
Posted:
Member since
Re: something I think you should read about john kerry--LONG
Interesting persepective from a Vietnam vet...
Oh No! Vietnam Again? Shame On Us All... ---------- Most Americans wonder why we're wasting time debating John Kerry's military record from 35-years ago. In this dangerous time when the U.S. faces an enormous challenge in responding to a new world, comparable to that we faced post-World War II, we should instead be seriously debating the future and what is best to do now.
I am a Marine Vietnam veteran, with a 4-year old son who is my life. I hugged him and cried on 9/11, and worry daily what the world will be that he enters. Who will lead him, and to what purpose, and at what costs? That is what we should be considering in this presidential year.
Senators Dole and McCain, who endured enormous suffering in previous wars, appeal to put the past behind us. So, why does Kerry's old record elicit such passions?
Unfortunately, while almost all Vietnam vets put Vietnam behind us, went on to build our lives, and are not activists, John Kerry chose to make his time in service the centerpiece of his campaign. Most Americans think this is a trivial issue. It's as if John Kerry's relatively minor credentials as a junior officer for a short time in Vietnam combat are all he can point to as his credentials for leading the most powerful nation on earth in the current challenges. No one should deny the valor of this service. But, is that what the American people and the citizens of the world should be focused on for the man who will significantly affect our lives and the lives of our children? John Kerry chose to create this election battlefield. So, he must answer for it, and be willing to face the music he wrote about himself.
Thirty-three years ago, I organized the Vietnam Veterans for a Just Peace in reaction to Kerry's organization Vietnam Veterans Against the War. John O'Neill and others joined me, and with the support of tens of thousands of Vietnam veterans, we rebutted Kerry's charges that we were all war criminals. Literally, no one was defending us, many Americans were discouraged by the charges, and we young Vietnam veterans were suffering horribly from discrimination in our efforts to get on with our lives.
Thirty-three years later, the surprise emergence of John Kerry as candidate and his centerpiecing of his Vietnam service stirred many Vietnam veterans to reclaim the image and honor that Kerry besmirched. We knew better. John Kerry continued the past 33-years to consistently misrepresent his activities and the calumny he brought upon us. That led to an enormous groundswell among now middle-aged Vietnam veterans, emerging from every walk of non-political life that we had individually built, to set the record straight.
It is well documented that most of the claims made by Kerry and his Vietnam Veterans Against the War were fraudulent, none of his anti-war vets were willing to provide evidence, and many of the Vietnam Veterans Against the War members had not served in Vietnam. We now know that the true leadership of the vets against was extreme radicals, directed by a Vietnam vet impersonator. Yet, John Kerry has never apologized. Youthful excess and zeal is one thing. Mature hypocrisy is another.
But, clinching the need for our public stand for the Kerry truth is his deceptive pride in it, fouling the perception of us among a new generation of citizens, maybe my son, that enrages so many of us. In April 2001, Kerry wrote that, 'We returned home to an America that was indifferent, even hostile. There were no parades, only nightmares. Veterans were spat upon, called baby-killers…' Yet, he continues to not apologize for his leading role in creating just that hostile atmosphere or exploiting it now. Indeed, in a disturbing pattern, only in March 2004 after exposure by those who served with him did Kerry's current National Coordinator of Veterans for John Kerry admit that his own published charge of atrocities is false.
We are not Republican stooges, as Kerry accuses any who oppose him. The proportion of Democrat vets is similar to the general population. We are simply pissed off and, once again, we are forced to stand up for ourselves, by ourselves, and yearn to fade back into our hard-built peaceful lives. We merely ask that America demand honesty of John Kerry, honest consideration of who has really demonstrated the public integrity to lead us, and hope for meaningful debate over our challenging future. Getting the staged uniforms out of his campaign commercials immediately would be the first critical step. Shame on us all Americans if we do not unite to demand this.
---------- Bruce N. Kesler Sergeant, USMC Vietnam 1969-70 Founder, Vietnam Veterans for a Just Peace
verdila
Posted:
Member since
Re: something I think you should read about john kerry--LONG
I just want to say that I have tremendous respect for people who go to war and defend our freedoms for this great country. I dont have children, but I would be terrified if my son or daughter were fighting right now. In my family, my father served in the National Guard for 5 yrs and my grandfather was a decorated hero in WW2 fighting against his parent's (my great grandparents on my fathers side emigrated here) own country of Italy.
However, as the last post pointed out - it was Kerry's idea to make his relatively short time in Vietnam (and I believe he was drafted) the centerpiece of his campaign so he should take responsibilty for the actions and decisions he made when he returned home from that war over 30 yrs ago.
marymoon
Posted:
Member since
Re: something I think you should read about john kerry--LONG
I don't think he's making it the centr fo his campaighn because it's his only credential. It's clearly to show theamericna people that he can handle a country in war and crisis. The campaigning is really for stupid people, who look to speeches and other BS for who to vote for. These are the people who don't even know what the candidates stand for, except for what comes through on TV. Unfortunately, that's most of America. i think he's just playing to his audience. Peopole are very concerned for their safety, and he needs to assure people that he can make them safe. people are criticizing John kerry, saying he can't lead the nation's army, but he can certainly do it better than someone who never even served. That's what i think the campaign perspective is.
elyssa222
Posted:
Member since
Re: something I think you should read about john kerry--LONG
marymoon...i think you always have a lot of great things to say and have many valid points but i just think you need to stop calling those people you dont agree with stupid...i have notice you do it a lot when it comes to politics. Just because someone doesnt agree with you it doesnt mean they are stupid
verdila
Posted:
Member since
Re: something I think you should read about john kerry--LONG
Posted by marymoon
I don't think he's making it the centr fo his campaighn because it's his only credential. It's clearly to show theamericna people that he can handle a country in war and crisis. The campaigning is really for stupid people, who look to speeches and other BS for who to vote for. These are the people who don't even know what the candidates stand for, except for what comes through on TV. Unfortunately, that's most of America. i think he's just playing to his audience. Peopole are very concerned for their safety, and he needs to assure people that he can make them safe. people are criticizing John kerry, saying he can't lead the nation's army, but he can certainly do it better than someone who never even served. That's what i think the campaign perspective is.
But that's just it - many people ARE questioning his ability to be the commander of our armed forces because of the actions he took following his time served in the war. It was the things he did at home that people have problems with, not the time he served in Vietnam.
It's obvious he is using his experience as a war VET to illustrate that he will be tougher on terrorism. But will he be tougher? Or will Kerry decide that this is not a war worth fighting and accuse our veterans of war crimes and create the kind of environment that was created during Vietnam where we pretty much abandoned our veterans upon their return home. Of course, if he is elected, I hope he does make us feel safer in this crazy world. I am on the fence as to how Kerry will be because of the actions he took following his service. Do I feel safe with Bush...? No. But I dont think I will ever feel completely safe again.
On a side note, as someone else pointed out about homeland security funds, I believe it was Kerry and/or some democrats who voted to take away money from NYC and give it to Iowa.
And one more thing - are you saying that most of America is stupid? That is a pretty shallow statement.