THe Love vs. Money Test

This is a good one for all of us to try

THe Love vs. Money Test

Results of 'The Test'
Are you in it for love or money?

Your score = 75
You'd choose love over cash any day of the week. Deep down, you're probably a hard-core romantic - you believe love conquers all and is not influenced by such superficial things as material wealth and possessions. You would consider dating someone, or even making a long-term commitment, based on their character and personality traits, not their bank account balance. This doesn't mean that you seek out underachievers; you probably appreciate financial success as much as anyone - it's just not at the top of your wish list when looking for a romantic partner. You would likely stand by your man/woman through severe dry spells, and not judge anyone for their lack of financial achievement. As long as you realize the difficulties that can come from being low on cash and are ready to face them if need be, your perspective shouldn't create any insurmountable obstacles

I aint no Anna Nicole Smith, I don't want no shrivelled up ole man...what am I going to do with him??

My score was 90 and it said the same thing as shamma.

Your score = 55

What does your score mean?
While you'd likely choose true love over big bucks, you do have certain limits. You hope that the one you fall for has ambition and makes decent moolah, but it's not one of your top criteria in selecting dating material. You know that the most important thing in a relationship is the person's personality (and, ok, maybe looks), not their bank account, and you're not about to pass up the opportunity to date wonderful people just because they haven't hit the jackpot. All you want is someone who reasonably tries to get ahead in life, but you wouldn't walk away from that special someone if the going got tough. You motto could be 'love conquers most things' - you're realistic enough to know that poverty is not anyone's cup of tea, but also idealistic enough to believe in the power of real love.

what did it say for a score of 35

I scored a 65:
While you'd likely choose true love over big bucks, you do have certain limits. You hope that the one you fall for has ambition and makes decent moolah, but it's not one of your top criteria in selecting dating material. You know that the most important thing in a relationship is the person's personality (and, ok, maybe looks), not their bank account, and you're not about to pass up the opportunity to date wonderful people just because they haven't hit the jackpot. All you want is someone who reasonably tries to get ahead in life, but you wouldn't walk away from that special someone if the going got tough. You motto could be 'love conquers most things' - you're realistic enough to know that poverty is not anyone's cup of tea, but also idealistic enough to believe in the power of real love.

Shamma: These are FUN!! Thanks for posting them!!

AND YES I TOLD THE TRUTH!

Results of 'The Test'
Are you in it for love or money?

Your score = 100
You'd choose love over cash any day of the week. Deep down, you're probably a hard-core romantic - you believe love conquers all and is not influenced by such superficial things as material wealth and possessions. You would consider dating someone, or even making a long-term commitment, based on their character and personality traits, not their bank account balance. This doesn't mean that you seek out underachievers; you probably appreciate financial success as much as anyone - it's just not at the top of your wish list when looking for a romantic partner. You would likely stand by your man/woman through severe dry spells, and not judge anyone for their lack of financial achievement. As long as you realize the difficulties that can come from being low on cash and are ready to face them if need be, your perspective shouldn't create any insurmountable obstacles.

I scored a 50, same description as Sonia

I got an 80!!! Wahoo!!!!!!!

60 for me. To be honest, I don't think scoring high on this is winning.

For example:
Q. You've been dating someone for almost a year when you find out they are heavily in debt. Would you end the relationship?

A. Why have they hid this for an entire year? This isn't about money, its about trust. What else has been hidden?

Q. Would you refuse to go out with a fast food clerk?

A. Are we talking temporary job while in graduate school, or a late twenties career clerk? If its temporary to make ends meet, fine. If they are lifers, then I'm just not sure we could relate. Here its isn't necessarily about the money, but about ambition, intelligence, and common interests.

Or maybe I'm just a cynic!

My score is 50

While you'd likely choose true love over big bucks, you do have certain limits. You hope that the one you fall for has ambition and makes decent moolah, but it's not one of your top criteria in selecting dating material. You know that the most important thing in a relationship is the person's personality (and, ok, maybe looks), not their bank account, and you're not about to pass up the opportunity to date wonderful people just because they haven't hit the jackpot. All you want is someone who reasonably tries to get ahead in life, but you wouldn't walk away from that special someone if the going got tough. You motto could be 'love conquers most things' - you're realistic enough to know that poverty is not anyone's cup of tea, but also idealistic enough to believe in the power of real love.

SCORE = 90
You'd choose love over cash any day of the week. Deep down, you're probably a hard-core romantic - you believe love conquers all and is not influenced by such superficial things as material wealth and possessions. You would consider dating someone, or even making a long-term commitment, based on their character and personality traits, not their bank account balance. This doesn't mean that you seek out underachievers; you probably appreciate financial success as much as anyone - it's just not at the top of your wish list when looking for a romantic partner. You would likely stand by your man/woman through severe dry spells, and not judge anyone for their lack of financial achievement. As long as you realize the difficulties that can come from being low on cash and are ready to face them if need be, your perspective shouldn't create any insurmountable obstacles.

Score 50


While you'd likely choose true love over big bucks, you do have certain limits. You hope that the one you fall for has ambition and makes decent moolah, but it's not one of your top criteria in selecting dating material. You know that the most important thing in a relationship is the person's personality (and, ok, maybe looks), not their bank account, and you're not about to pass up the opportunity to date wonderful people just because they haven't hit the jackpot. All you want is someone who reasonably tries to get ahead in life, but you wouldn't walk away from that special someone if the going got tough. You motto could be 'love conquers most things' - you're realistic enough to know that poverty is not anyone's cup of tea, but also idealistic enough to believe in the power of real love

Results of 'The Test'
Are you in it for love or money?

Your score = 80






What does your score mean?
You'd choose love over cash any day of the week. Deep down, you're probably a hard-core romantic - you believe love conquers all and is not influenced by such superficial things as material wealth and possessions. You would consider dating someone, or even making a long-term commitment, based on their character and personality traits, not their bank account balance. This doesn't mean that you seek out underachievers; you probably appreciate financial success as much as anyone - it's just not at the top of your wish list when looking for a romantic partner. You would likely stand by your man/woman through severe dry spells, and not judge anyone for their lack of financial achievement. As long as you realize the difficulties that can come from being low on cash and are ready to face them if need be, your perspective shouldn't create any insurmountable obstacles.
I knew what it would say about me. I'm not materialistic at all.