WEDDING PHOTOS GONE WRONG...
check this out
From sky news:
A wedding photographer has been ordered to reimburse a couple after a judge described photos of their big day as 'woefully inadequate'.
Bride and gloom: poor lighting affected many of the shots
Marc and Sylvia Day paid Gareth Bowers, from Fresh Images, some £1,450 to take pictures of their marriage.
But they were so unimpressed with the 400 snaps he took, only 22 of them were approved.
The cutting of the cake was missed and most of the shots were poorly lit and crooked, with heads chopped off and guests not looking at the camera.
Mr Day said: 'Some of those memories we will never get back again.
'(Mr Bowers) is the Don Quixote of wedding photography - he just doesn't believe that he can't do it.'
Wonky photos like this one also featured
A video made of the wedding misses the pair arriving and includes a moment where the operator drops his camera - and swears.
'The videographer missed us turning up at the reception so he filmed the driver opening the car door with nobody inside it,' Mrs Day, 50, from West Yorkshire, said.
And to add insult to injury, some thank you cards provided for the couple to give to guests had both of their names spelt incorrectly.
'Thank you - Slyvia & Mark,' the cards read.
This is despite the Days spending days going to 11 wedding fairs in the hope they would find the perfect service for their big day.
They later sued Mr Bowers for the shoddy service.
Deputy District Judge Keith Nightingale found in favour of the Days at Pontefract county court, ruling the work 'woefully inadequate'.
He ordered the photographer to reimburse £500 and pay £450 damages, £170 court fees and £100 compensation.
pictures
________________________
Thoughts?
I would be DEVESTATED to receive photos like that...
Number 1 - Creepy. Looks like he's stalking her from the garden.
Number 2 - Where the heck is the middle guy got his hands?
Number 3 - Ok, Nice candid shot...but what?
Number 4 - Wait? Who is that? Is someone there?
Number 5 - The red van is a nice touch...
Number 6 - Fading into the distance anyone?
Number 7 - And it usually helps when you spell their names right...
Sigh.
________________________
Read that on dance.net... that is pretty bad and the first picture is CREEEEEEEEPY!![]()
From sky news:
A wedding photographer has been ordered to reimburse a couple after a judge described photos of their big day as 'woefully inadequate'.
Bride and gloom: poor lighting affected many of the shots
Marc and Sylvia Day paid Gareth Bowers, from Fresh Images, some £1,450 to take pictures of their marriage.
But they were so unimpressed with the 400 snaps he took, only 22 of them were approved.
The cutting of the cake was missed and most of the shots were poorly lit and crooked, with heads chopped off and guests not looking at the camera.
Mr Day said: 'Some of those memories we will never get back again.
'(Mr Bowers) is the Don Quixote of wedding photography - he just doesn't believe that he can't do it.'
Wonky photos like this one also featured
A video made of the wedding misses the pair arriving and includes a moment where the operator drops his camera - and swears.
'The videographer missed us turning up at the reception so he filmed the driver opening the car door with nobody inside it,' Mrs Day, 50, from West Yorkshire, said.
And to add insult to injury, some thank you cards provided for the couple to give to guests had both of their names spelt incorrectly.
'Thank you - Slyvia & Mark,' the cards read.
This is despite the Days spending days going to 11 wedding fairs in the hope they would find the perfect service for their big day.
They later sued Mr Bowers for the shoddy service.
Deputy District Judge Keith Nightingale found in favour of the Days at Pontefract county court, ruling the work 'woefully inadequate'.
He ordered the photographer to reimburse £500 and pay £450 damages, £170 court fees and £100 compensation.
pictures
________________________
Thoughts?
I would be DEVESTATED to receive photos like that...
Number 1 - Creepy. Looks like he's stalking her from the garden.
Number 2 - Where the heck is the middle guy got his hands?
Number 3 - Ok, Nice candid shot...but what?
Number 4 - Wait? Who is that? Is someone there?
Number 5 - The red van is a nice touch...
Number 6 - Fading into the distance anyone?
Number 7 - And it usually helps when you spell their names right...
Sigh.
________________________
Read that on dance.net... that is pretty bad and the first picture is CREEEEEEEEPY!
