Personally, I like the old one better. Not that it is not working, but it was easier to follow I think. This plan gives you unlimited fruit, but I wonder about the sugar???
JACKIELUVSBRIAN
Posted:
Member since
Re: Weight watchers
i never did the old plan so I cant compare =( I do love WW though. I've lost 8.5 pounds in 4 weeks. I love the unlimited fruit...not sure what I would do without it!
CroatianBride
Posted:
Member since
Re: Weight watchers
Old one was much easier for me to follow, this one unless you have a laptop or iphone handy, you cant figure out the points value. Not a fan.
SimHawk8
Posted:
Member since
Re: Weight watchers
It's good but it's more work in figuring out the points.
Andrea12785
Posted:
Member since
Re: Weight watchers
Posted by RFutureBegins2day
Personally, I like the old one better. Not that it is not working, but it was easier to follow I think. This plan gives you unlimited fruit, but I wonder about the sugar???
They accounted for the sugars in the fruit when they raised the values of everything else. Basically playing mind games with you. You can have this 'sweet apple' for 0 points but this sweet piece of candy is 5 points. Or at least that's what the leader told my mom.
Leia1920
Posted:
Member since
Re: Weight watchers
Megan want to go with me? There are meetings in shoreham and riverhead I need to get vack on the ww band wagon
SME418
Posted:
Member since
Re: Weight watchers
I like the new plan but the same as everyone else said...you need your iphone, the calculator or the laptop to figure out points.
I think the new plan causes people to eat much cleaner..choosing fruit over 100 calorie pack etc.
Mel-N-Az 2011
Posted:
Member since
Re: Weight watchers
I LOVE the new plan! I'm down 9.3 in the first month (although I'm slacking this week cuz i'm sick and don't feel like being good). I think its WAY easier than the original plan. I was always starving on the old plan, but now I can't seem to use up my daily points.
and the best part is that I haven't exercized yet (too busy)... imagine if I had?