XOXO

jenny2penny Posted: Apr 14, 2004 10:28 AM

.

dubliner Posted: Apr 14, 2004 10:32 AM

Re: For those who DID table names...Were guest confused?

No one was confuised and we did years - as long as the table number is big and visible. Plus most people know who they are sitting with, so you really just need one guest at the table to do all the work

bridzilla Posted: Apr 14, 2004 10:32 AM

Re: For those who DID table names...Were guest confused?

Yeah, I'm curious too.

jenny2penny Posted: Apr 14, 2004 10:34 AM

.

shawl Posted: Apr 14, 2004 10:45 AM

Re: For those who DID table names...Were guest confused?

No, there wasn't any confusion - people actually seemed to enjoy walking around to look at other tables. Also, our hall helped any guests having trouble to their seats.

beachbride22 Posted: Apr 14, 2004 11:27 AM

Re: For those who DID table names...Were guest confused?

We were not confused as we had our place cards in our hands. We wandered until we found it. It was a smaller wedding though. I am thinking of the same thing but I do not know if my space at the BYC would be too big to send 175 guests wandering around.

karen32 Posted: Apr 14, 2004 11:35 AM

Re: For those who DID table names...Were guest confused?

you might want to consider doing both. honestly, the 'older' generation is not going to understand table names. they are so set in their ways, they will be wandering looking for a number.