1 photographer vs 2 photographer!!!

Original post by HopelessRomantic

Oct 26, 2010 06:17 PM

im still on the fence over 1 photographer vs 2 photographer for the day of the wedding... its a $500 difference but im thinking its totally worth it .. I would hate to regret my decision but going with just one photographer... .. signing contract with FH in 3days.. PLZ HELP me decide!!!!!

xoabxo Posted: Oct 27, 2010 08:02 PM

Re: 1 photographer vs 2 photographer!!!

were having 2 i wish we could have like ten seeing how i love pictures but i think that is a little overboard

mollygurl24 Posted: Oct 28, 2010 09:38 AM

Re: 1 photographer vs 2 photographer!!!

One of my biggest things is i wanted two. So I say go with 2.

FutureJOC Posted: Oct 28, 2010 09:46 AM

Re: 1 photographer vs 2 photographer!!!

I personally would do 2 photogs. I wouldn't want to risk missing a thing and with 2 photogs you get 2 perspectives of the wedding. One can be more traditional in their shooting style and one more photojournalistic.

rmiller2255 Posted: Oct 28, 2010 09:46 AM

Re: 1 photographer vs 2 photographer!!!

It depends how many people you are having, our photographer told us it's not necessary unless you want the groomsmen getting ready. We are having only 120-140 people so we're only having one!

suzie411 Posted: Oct 28, 2010 09:56 AM

Re: 1 photographer vs 2 photographer!!!

definitely go for 2!!!!!

one place i was considering, it cost $1,000 for the extra photog. luckily, where we went, the second photog is in the package!!! (Duet)

ImgonnabeMrsC Posted: Oct 28, 2010 10:42 AM

Re: 1 photographer vs 2 photographer!!!

I think you should totally do it!! We hired one photographer, 2 videographers...but our friend who just took our e-pics was amazing, so we are thinking of hiring him as a 2nd photo =)