Post New Topic

Bad Wal-Mart?

Claud2001 Posted:

Bad Wal-Mart?

Someone forwarded this commentary on Wal-Mart to me via email, and I found ALOT of this information to be shocking at very sad. It seems Wal-Mart Corp. is not the company they 'claim' to be in their ads....
Proving that consumers NEED to educate themselves about the stores they frequently patron...just sharing this info w/you all as an FYI.



The owners of one of America's premiere retail corporations is comprised of
five of the ten richest people in the world, all from the same family. Their
personal wealth eclipses $100 BILLION dollars. Last year the companies CEO
was paid a cool $11.5 million, more than the annual salaries of 765 of his
employees combined! The company's profits are over $7 BILLION annually. In
these difficult economic times how do they do it?

- This company runs ads featuring the United States flag and proclaims 'We
Buy American'. In 2001 they moved their worldwide purchasing headquarters to
China and are the largest importer of Chinese goods in the US, purchasing
over $10 BILLION of Chinese-made products annually. Products made mostly by
women and children working in the labor hell-holes China is famous for.
- Their average employee working in the US makes $15,000 a year, $7.22 per
hour!
- These employees gross under $11,000 a year.
- The company brags that 70% of their employees are full time, but fails to
disclose that they count anyone working 28 hours a week or more as full
time.
- WalMart refuses to stock Emergency Contraception at its pharmacies
- There are no health care benefits unless you have worked for the company
for two years.
- With a turnover rate averaging above 50% per year, only 38% of their 1.3
million employees have health care coverage. -In California alone it's
estimated that the taxpayers pay over $20 million annually to subsidize
health care benefits for these employees who get none from this behemoth
corporation.
- According to a report by PBS's 'Now' with Bill Moyer, their managers are
trained in what government social programs are available for these
'employees' to take advantage of so that the company can pass on those costs
to you and me. It allows them to not only keep their $7 BILLION in annual
profits, but to do so by substituting benefits they refuse to provide with
benefits paid for with taxpayer dollars.
- This company holds the record for the most suits filed against it by the
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. A lawyer from 'Business Week' (not
exactly the bastion for supporting Labor) said, 'I have never seen this kind
of blatant disregard for the law.' They had to pay $750,000.00 in Arizona
for blatant discrimination against the disabled! The judge was so incensed
that he also order them to run commercials admitting their guilt.
- The National Labor Relations Board has issued over 40 formal complaints
against the corporation in 25 different states in just the past five years.
The NLRB's top lawyer believed that their labor violations, such as illegal
spying on employees, fraudulent record keeping, falsifying time cards to
avoid paying overtime, threats, illegal firings for union organizing etc.,
were so widespread that he was looking into filing a very rare national
complaint against the company. (The company contributed $2,159,330.00 to GW
Bush and the GOP in 2000 and 2002. The NLRB attorney was replaced when
President Bush took office.).
- Nearly 1 MILLION women are involved in the largest class-action suit every
filed against a corporation. Although women make up over 65% of this
corporations work force only 10% of them are managers. The women who have
become store managers make $16,400 a year LESS then the men.
- The corporation took out nearly 350,000 life insurance policies on their
employees. They did not tell the employees and then named the corporation as
the beneficiary. They are now being sued by numerous employees, and although
the corporation has stopped this practice of purchasing what is known as
'Dead Peasant Policy's', a company spokesperson stated, 'The company feels
it acted properly and legally in doing this.'
- They force employees to work after ordering them to punch out. In Texas
alone this practice of 'wage theft' is estimated to have cost employees $30
million per year. Wage theft or 'off-the-clock' lawsuits are pending in 25
states. In New Mexico they paid $400,000.00 in one suit and in Colorado they
had to pay $50 MILLION to settle one class-action case brought against them.
In
Oregon a jury found them guilty of locking employees in the building and of
forcing unpaid overtime.
- With 4,400 stores they practice 'predatory pricing.' They come into a
community and sell their goods at below cost until they drive local
businesses under. Once they have captured the market the prices go up.
- Locally owned and operated businesses put virtually all of their money
back into the community which helps keep the local economies vibrant. This
corporation sucks the money out of the local community, decreases wages and
benefits and ships the profits out of state.
- This company doesn't buy locally or bank locally. They replace three
decent paying jobs in a community with two poorly paid 'part-timers'.
- In Kirksville, Missouri when this company came to town, four clothing
stores, four grocery stores, a stationary store, a fabric store and a
lawn-and-garden store all went under. Eleven businesses are now gone.

(The above information can be found in 'Thieves in High Places', James
Hightower, The Penguin Group, New York, NY, 2003 p. 166 - 193.)

Now you know how they can claim, 'Always low prices.' Wal-Mart is the
largest corporation in the world, larger than General Motors and ExxonMobil.
Wal-Mart will reap over 250 billion in sales in 2003, which is larger then
the entire gross national product of Israel and Ireland combined. It has
over 1.3 million employees. It sells more groceries, jewelry, photo
processing, dog food, and vitamins than any other chain in the world.
Wal-Mart is owned by the Walton family. They will also never see a dime from
my wallet again.

Please feel free to circulate this memo to everyone on your email lists.
Only we, the citizens of this great country can stop this race to the
bottom.

''Never doubt that a small group of committed people can change the world;
indeed it is the only thing that ever has.' Margaret Mead, Anthropologist

Happy, healthy and safe New Year to all.

Brian Dawe
Lincoln County
Democratic Party Chair
Jordan Posted:

Re: Bad Wal-Mart?

I absolutely ABHOR Wal-Mart and have never shopped there.

Their practice of banning free speech and not selling certain BC pills ('b/c they cause abortion') alone, keeps me away.

They're bullies.
sonia Posted:

Re: Bad Wal-Mart?

i'm sure it's all true. they just had a huge article on it in Fast Company this month. A lot of things drastically changed after the original owner, Sam Walton died.

SomedayBride Posted:

Re: Bad Wal-Mart?

I knew WalMart was bad, but I didn't realize it was this bad. Did you know that they have more than 300 permanent buyers in China, and last year imported $12 BILLION of Chinese goods, with the aim of keeping consumer prices down. While they are keeping prices down, they are taking away the jobs of the Americans who shop there. Also, another fact that just blows me away is the fact that if WalMart were a country, it would rank ahead of Russia and Great Britain in total Chinese imports. I would gladly pay more for American made goods.

Irishbride Posted:

Re: Bad Wal-Mart?

I dont usually shop these b/c of these very reasons.

Jeanene Posted:

Re: Bad Wal-Mart?

Unfortunatley I am not surprised by any of this information. I do not shop at Wal-Mart. I shop for those items I would buy at Wal-Mart at Target. I wonder if Targets stats are any better!

alina Posted:

Re: Bad Wal-Mart?

I am not surprised at any of these statements, however, I think we all have to keep in mind that a)Most people don't want to pay a lot of $ for consumer goods and b)American labor and way of living is expensive.

And I can't stand it when people quote : 'but the poor people in china are being exploited at $0.50/hour'. Hello, their cost of living may only be $50/month or less, hence the low wages.

I am sorry, I realize its a harsh statement, and Wal-Marts actions may be predatory, but if I have to pay $30 at a small mom&pop store and $15 at Wal-Mart, I'll shop at Wal-Mart.

Most small stores can't compete with them, due to a lot of factors.

And I don't think that sending work to lower cost countries takes away from other people's jobs here. There is enough work to be done in this country.
ChristineC68 Posted:

Re: Bad Wal-Mart?


Posted by Jeanene

Unfortunatley I am not surprised by any of this information. I do not shop at Wal-Mart. I shop for those items I would buy at Wal-Mart at Target. I wonder if Targets stats are any better!



I doubt Target's stats are any better, same for Kohls, Kmart and all these other places. The cost of manufacturing certain things is nearly prohibitive in the United States. With in store markups, I would expect to pay more than triple the price for certain items if everything was made in the US.

PrincessRose Posted:

Re: Bad Wal-Mart?

I have had friends working at Wal-mart, Kohl's, and Target. The Kohl's and Target stats ARE better. At the very least, they do not practice predatory pricing and their employees are paid for the hours they work.

Walmart, however, has an orientation class where you are taught why 'Walmart=Good'. My friend likened it to Brainwashing.
alina Posted:

Re: Bad Wal-Mart?

The only difference b/w walmart vs. target vs. kohl's are their price point at which they attract shoppers. Just because they don't charge rock bottom prices doesn't mean that they're gooddy stores who don't want to compete and be successful at it. They probably have a higher profit margin.

And orientation happens at nearly every job I have had, both in retail (Wawa) and office. Every company wants you to believe you're working for the best and what they do is the best.

karen32 Posted:

Re: Bad Wal-Mart?

wal-mart also buys everything on 'consignment' - in other words, they don't own their inventory. if they can't sell something, they have the right to force the manufacturer to buy it back. that's why their sales and profit stats are always so good.

Sassyz75 Posted:

Re: Bad Wal-Mart?

I refuse to purchase anything at Walmart.

If I have to pay higher prices to support my fellow Americans and help other businesses stay open, I will....

I refuse to allow Walmart and the other companies like IBM send good jobs out of this country.
Claud2001 Posted:

Re: Bad Wal-Mart?


Posted by karen32

wal-mart also buys everything on 'consignment' - in other words, they don't own their inventory. if they can't sell something, they have the right to force the manufacturer to buy it back. that's why their sales and profit stats are always so good.



Wow - that's disturbing too! If I were a manufacturer, I wouldn't want Wal-Mart distributing my goods!
Kate Posted:

Re: Bad Wal-Mart?


Posted by karen32

wal-mart also buys everything on 'consignment' - in other words, they don't own their inventory. if they can't sell something, they have the right to force the manufacturer to buy it back. that's why their sales and profit stats are always so good.



ok I had to check this out because I know a friend of mine distributes plush toys to Walmart. She said they do not sell on consignment to *anyone*, including Walmart. She did say however that since they are an international company maybe their policy is different with domestic companies. Although I doubt they get much of their goods locally anyway...
karen32 Posted:

Re: Bad Wal-Mart?

kate - 'consignment' may not be the right term. i can't remember the exact term. when i was in Graduate school for business, we had a whole big discussion about companies manipulating their earnings and wal-mart was the prime example. they are powerful enough to have 'arrangements' with certain manufacturers to rebuy items from Wal Mart that don't sell. i don't think 'consignment' is the 100% right term. essentially, the point was that wal-mart does not outright own most of their inventory.

ChristineC68 Posted:

Re: Bad Wal-Mart?

My company sells clothing to them. Once we ship it to them it is theirs we don't buy it back from them. It is deducted from our inventory schedule. Of course we accept returns in the event they are damaged or if they are shipped late and do not meet promotional deadlines, etc.

I am not a defender of Wal-Mart, (I can count on one hand the number of times I even stepped foot in one), but I wonder where people that only buy american made clothing shops?

Our customer listing is fairly extensive and other then chain stores such as the Gap, express, etc, we have sold to them all and we import.
coselige Posted:

Re: Bad Wal-Mart?

I recently read an article about WalMart and how they were almost singlehandedly responsible for the bankruptcy of Vlasic Pickle.

Basically, they are so big that companies such as Vlasic are forced to sell to them and Wal-Mart can set the prices. According to the article, Wal-Mart essentially forced Vlasic to allow them to sell gallon jars of pickles for 2.99. The problem is that no consumer is now going to pay the standard 2.49 price for a smaller jar of pickles. Because Vlasic could no longer sell their 'regular sized' pickles at a normal price, they eventually went bankrupt.

It makes you wonder how 'pro-community' Wal-Mart really is.
MrsERod Posted:

Re: Bad Wal-Mart?

deby Posted:

Re: Bad Wal-Mart?

Wal-marts practices are disturbing.
alina Posted:

Re: Bad Wal-Mart?


Posted by coselige

I recently read an article about WalMart and how they were almost singlehandedly responsible for the bankruptcy of Vlasic Pickle.

Basically, they are so big that companies such as Vlasic are forced to sell to them and Wal-Mart can set the prices. According to the article, Wal-Mart essentially forced Vlasic to allow them to sell gallon jars of pickles for 2.99. The problem is that no consumer is now going to pay the standard 2.49 price for a smaller jar of pickles. Because Vlasic could no longer sell their 'regular sized' pickles at a normal price, they eventually went bankrupt.

It makes you wonder how 'pro-community' Wal-Mart really is.



I think part of Vlassic's reason for bankruptcy is its inability to have a diverse customer base.
If Wal-Mart purchased a significant portion of their products, then they knew that they were risking a concentration in customers and accepted that risk.

After all Vlassic didn't HAVE to sell its products in Wal-Mart.

Reply to this topic

Log in to reply or quote a post.