There is nothing wrong with DanielleRenee's work. I WAS VERY HAPPY after my trial with her, the only issue for me arose when I got the pictures developed. I give more credit to the photos than what I saw in the mirror (since once the wedding is over, all you have to look at is pictures), which is why I wanted to look elsewhere.
I have upset DanielleRenee by things that I have said, since I did not previously discuss them with her, and I want to publicly make an apology. She is a very sweet person, a competent make-up artist, and someone who I had a very nice time with. It was not my intention to post any negative feedback about her work. Anyone who is using her will NOT be disappointed.
Please don't have a bad impression of her because of anything that I said (or what anyone else said, for that matter). It's all a matter of preference. And as some people said, the camera and lighting really do make a world of difference. I regret any 'bad press' that she may have received on my part, and I hope we can put it behind us and focus on happier times to come.
If anyone has any questions or comments, please feel free to FM me.
Jill
mlp924
Posted:
Member since
Re: FOR THE RECORD... (please read)
That was very nice of you!
bethsiar
Posted:
Member since
Re: FOR THE RECORD... (please read)
Jill, I was trying to get this point across too! Thanks for posting it!
palebride
Posted:
Member since
Re: FOR THE RECORD... (please read)
i think htis is an important lesson for all. and i personally have not gone for makeup trials yet - so i will have the opportunity to try EVERYONE out!
Jordan
Posted:
Member since
Re: FOR THE RECORD... (please read)
That was very nice of you Jill - for the record, I don't think you did anything wrong.
jennbaby
Posted:
Member since
Re: FOR THE RECORD... (please read)
Very nice Jill
daisybride
Posted:
Member since
Re: FOR THE RECORD... (please read)
Too Sweet
yabbobay
Posted:
Member since
Re: FOR THE RECORD... (please read)
bethsiar
Posted:
Member since
Re: FOR THE RECORD... (please read)
hey Jill, just one comment--do a search on the name
Aileen123.
She's getting married on a Tuesday.
Just a little idea of business practices and how some should be changed.
kelly6273
Posted:
Member since
Re: FOR THE RECORD... (please read)
Sage10.03
Posted:
Member since
Re: FOR THE RECORD... (please read)
I saw those posts.... hmmmmm????
Jess2
Posted:
Member since
Re: FOR THE RECORD... (please read)
I just searched too...interesting....
lilmrs
Posted:
Member since
Re: FOR THE RECORD... (please read)
I see the connection too.
pschica
Posted:
Member since
Re: FOR THE RECORD... (please read)
i'm dumb and don't see it.....can someone fm me??
Lunatrek
Posted:
Member since
Re: FOR THE RECORD... (please read)
Yeah I'm not sure what the message is either...?
prncssrachel
Posted:
Member since
Re: FOR THE RECORD... (please read)
Keep reading the posts, I picked up on it....
mlp924
Posted:
Member since
Re: FOR THE RECORD... (please read)
So are you saying Aileen is Danielle Renee? I don't think so. She told me that LIW blocks her from even seeing anything but the vendor board let alone posting.
bethsiar
Posted:
Member since
Re: FOR THE RECORD... (please read)
That is so strange because when I spoke to Marie Katz, she already knew what was happening because she had followed along.
mlp924
Posted:
Member since
Re: FOR THE RECORD... (please read)
so they can see? That is kind of creepy! DR told me that LIW forwarded her my post on the vendor board (to her reg email) so she could take care of it).
EvenEdan
Posted:
Member since
Re: FOR THE RECORD... (please read)
As far as I know vendors can read any of the boards they just can't reply to any threads except those on the 'Vendors helping Brides' board. I have had many vendors tell me that they follow what brides are saying on the boards. I think that is just normal, of course they want to see what kind of buzz they are getting.
