FH and his BM are not wearing vests w/ their tuxedos. They both have ties (FH has a white one, BM has a black one). Are vests really necessary?!
I'm in a pissy mood today and questioning all wedding decisions lol
Bree71584
Posted:
Member since
Re: Hmmmmm, question for reassurance..
i dont think its necessary its really a matter of taste. i usually perfer the guys to wear bowties and cummerbands and if they're in long skinny ties than i say yes a vest completes the look.
go to mens warehouse even if you dont end up using them they showed us so many different variations you can do it was really helpful
adelz
Posted:
Member since
Re: Hmmmmm, question for reassurance..
They already got their tuxedos and we love how they look. I'm just being PMS'y today and questioning things lol I just don't know if it's looked down upon if they don't have a vest.
FutureJOC
Posted:
Member since
Re: Hmmmmm, question for reassurance..
It really does just depend on your preference. I really like the way the guys look in the vests so we are doing vests with long ties for the GMs and FH. That way when they take off their jackets at the reception they still have a look that stands out in the crowd to distinguish them from the other guests in suits.
pjc92980
Posted:
Member since
Re: Hmmmmm, question for reassurance..
its not necessary it all depends on what you like.
We are having the GM in vests, and we have some other family renting tuxs so they said they would wear them without the vests to dress it down a bit
Soon2bMrsB91511
Posted:
Member since
Re: Hmmmmm, question for reassurance..
G-d no! Ew, I legitimately skeeve vests. UGHHH!
I just find them so repulsive and disgusting. Even the really nice ones still look cheap and gross.
We're not doing vests at all! My FH is wearing an ivory tie with ivory braces (AKA the fancy term for 'suspenders') and the GMs are wearing black ties with black braces.
We love this look. It's super Hollywood-chic, with a modern twist on a traditional ensemble.
adelz
Posted:
Member since
Re: Hmmmmm, question for reassurance..
This is good to hear - thanks ladies. I wasn't sure if it's a 'must.' FH loves how the tux looks w/out the vest - so we'll stick to it.
adelz
Posted:
Member since
Re: Hmmmmm, question for reassurance..
Posted by Soon2bMrsB91511
G-d no! Ew, I legitimately skeeve vests. UGHHH!
I just find them so repulsive and disgusting. Even the really nice ones still look cheap and gross.
We're not doing vests at all! My FH is wearing an ivory tie with ivory braces (AKA the fancy term for 'suspenders') and the GMs are wearing black ties with black braces.
We love this look. It's super Hollywood-chic, with a modern twist on a traditional ensemble.
How do you really feel about vests
evita2781
Posted:
Member since
Re: Hmmmmm, question for reassurance..
we're actually not doing vests - it's already hot enough and i think ties are fine. the groomsmen are doing tie and suspenders. FH is doing vest and bow tie
LindyBride22
Posted:
Member since
Re: Hmmmmm, question for reassurance..
Fh is wearing a vest just because he doesnt like cummerbands, but the rest will have cummerbands and bowties, no vest. Youll be fine!
adelz
Posted:
Member since
Re: Hmmmmm, question for reassurance..
Thanks gals Glad to see other non-vesters.
LKatz1029
Posted:
Member since
Re: Hmmmmm, question for reassurance..
Posted by adelz
Posted by Soon2bMrsB91511
G-d no! Ew, I legitimately skeeve vests. UGHHH!
I just find them so repulsive and disgusting. Even the really nice ones still look cheap and gross.
We're not doing vests at all! My FH is wearing an ivory tie with ivory braces (AKA the fancy term for 'suspenders') and the GMs are wearing black ties with black braces.
We love this look. It's super Hollywood-chic, with a modern twist on a traditional ensemble.
