Post New Topic

Howard Dean is as irrelevant as Janet Jackson's other breast!

OctGroom Posted:

Howard Dean is as irrelevant as Janet Jackson's other breast!

LOL.. heard this on the news tonight.......

nehaliasz Posted:

Re: Howard Dean is as irrelevant as Janet Jackson's other breast!

thats funny!
peeweesgirl Posted:

Re: Howard Dean is as irrelevant as Janet Jackson's other breast!

lol ~
shelzyp Posted:

Re: Howard Dean is as irrelevant as Janet Jackson's other breast!

Kerry for President!!!!

yabbobay Posted:

Re: Howard Dean is as irrelevant as Janet Jackson's other breast!




man did he take a beating last night!!!!!!



I'm still rooting for Edwards....
sonia Posted:

Re: Howard Dean is as irrelevant as Janet Jackson's other breast!

haha that's hilarious!

Maribelle7777 Posted:

Re: Howard Dean is as irrelevant as Janet Jackson's other breast!

Lieberman's dropping out
1017Bride Posted:

Re: Howard Dean is as irrelevant as Janet Jackson's other breast!

LOL! He wants to continue even though he hasn't won a primary!

1017Bride Posted:

Re: Howard Dean is as irrelevant as Janet Jackson's other breast!

Yeah sorry to hear about Lieberman. I have no idea who I like. I read about Kerry but need to find out more about Edwards and Clark.

djkatscan Posted:

Re: Howard Dean is as irrelevant as Janet Jackson's other breast!

JANETS BOOB FOR PRESIDENT!

Oh um...sorry did I say that?
1017Bride Posted:

Re: Howard Dean is as irrelevant as Janet Jackson's other breast!

LOL! You mean instead of some of the other boobs that are running? J/K!

cocoa Posted:

Re: Howard Dean is as irrelevant as Janet Jackson's other breast!

that was exellent!!!

OctGroom Posted:

Re: Howard Dean is as irrelevant as Janet Jackson's other breast!


Posted by 1017Bride

LOL! You mean instead of some of the other boobs that are running? J/K!




Good one 1017 .. you think out of 250 million people we could do better than what we got for politicians.
julybride444 Posted:

Re: Howard Dean is as irrelevant as Janet Jackson's other breast!

Actually, I'm not sure why the media is saying stuff like that.

Dean is still second in number of delegates, and that's what counts in the primary. Kerry has approx. 200, Dean has 117. Everyone else trails FAR behind. So, Dean is still 2nd in the race. It's number of delegates that counts, not number of states!

I still like Edwards too, Kerry turns my stomach. He's lied so many times, and his voting record is terribly hypocritical.

Would he be better than Bush? Absolutely, but still not what we need as far as a real change goes.

Reply to this topic

Log in to reply or quote a post.