So the TWO people I wanted to shoot my Bridal Shower are not available Both of them....
Now Should i just hired another persion from Craiglist... (im being quouted $350-400) or should i NOT hired one...
I am scared that people will not take pics....
What would YOU do?
evita2781
Posted:
Member since
Re: Photographer: To have or NOT to have?
i would just save your money. give one of your BM's the responsibility of taking all the pics
DreamyD
Posted:
Member since
Re: Photographer: To have or NOT to have?
No way- give one of your bm's a camera and put them on the duty for the day.
Everyone always takes pics.
DO NOT SPEND THAT!!
ANDREA0316
Posted:
Member since
Re: Photographer: To have or NOT to have?
I assigned my camera to a friend and just asked her to get pics of everything!!.... if you can afford a photographer for your bridal shower thats great but if you're cutting costs, just tell someone they have to be on it!
mybabylovesmoi
Posted:
Member since
Re: Photographer: To have or NOT to have?
V, that is so unnecessary! that is a lot of money. People will take pics
VCanizalez
Posted:
Member since
Re: Photographer: To have or NOT to have?
Thanks chicas... I will do that then =-)
rosatemp
Posted:
Member since
Re: Photographer: To have or NOT to have?
Posted by evita2781
i would just save your money. give one of your BM's the responsibility of taking all the pics
ITA my guest took pics and i gave my camera to my cousins and they took pics also
leesah85
Posted:
Member since
Re: Photographer: To have or NOT to have?
Posted by rosatemp
Posted by evita2781
i would just save your money. give one of your BM's the responsibility of taking all the pics
ITA my guest took pics and i gave my camera to my cousins and they took pics also
same here
JuneBride14
Posted:
Member since
Re: Photographer: To have or NOT to have?
Posted by evita2781
i would just save your money. give one of your BM's the responsibility of taking all the pics
this- it is nice to have pictures from the bridal shower but not imperative that they be professional pictures.. i would save the money and put it towards something else
jettahot
Posted:
Member since
Re: Photographer: To have or NOT to have?
All of your friends and family will be taking pics anyway!! I wouldnt spend the extra money!!
SoontoBMrsS
Posted:
Member since
Re: Photographer: To have or NOT to have?
I'd save the money!! There will be tons of people there taking photos.
smilesjc81
Posted:
Member since
Re: Photographer: To have or NOT to have?
v my girlfriend takes GREAT pictures
she did my bridal shower
let me know if you need it ( she is going pro )
Moonmist09
Posted:
Member since
Re: Photographer: To have or NOT to have?
everyone will take pictures! trust us on this one - assign someone the job that day and stress-not!
MarryingMyBFF1110
Posted:
Member since
Re: Photographer: To have or NOT to have?
Save the money V !!
MNM0805
Posted:
Member since
Re: Photographer: To have or NOT to have?
My mom had her camera there and my cousin took pictures. Save the money. I'm sure there is someone there that can take the pictures for you.
monamiestephanie
Posted:
Member since
Re: Photographer: To have or NOT to have?
ditto!
Posted by evita2781
i would just save your money. give one of your BM's the responsibility of taking all the pics
Cataverri
Posted:
Member since
Re: Photographer: To have or NOT to have?
I didnt have one...whatever pictures I have are from my camara, my moms and bm.
FDNYwife1029
Posted:
Member since
Re: Photographer: To have or NOT to have?
save your money honey!!!!! everyone will have cameras!
itbroi805
Posted:
Member since
Re: Photographer: To have or NOT to have?
def don't waste the money! tell your friends and fam to take a ton of pics!
Richiesgirl
Posted:
Member since
Re: Photographer: To have or NOT to have?
OMG absolutely not!! I had one girl with the camera the whole time...thats it.
