Do you think it is worth it to add plasma screens to the DJ package? If you had it do you think it was worth the extra money?
ssdbk
Posted:
Member since
Re: plasma or no plasma??
MIne was through the videographer. I didn't have a DJ. The screens were set way back. He didn't force anyone to have their pictures taken. The dance floor was always packed. If anything, this made the party much more lively! No one was just sitting watching the thing, but everyone commented on some of the pictures. It was also great during dinner. Oh, and it was a lot less than $1,200 and it was a professional photographer, not just a dude w/ camera!!!!
E-n-K
Posted:
Member since
Re: plasma or no plasma??
Posted by ssdbk
MIne was through the videographer. I didn't have a DJ. The screens were set way back. He didn't force anyone to have their pictures taken. The dance floor was always packed. If anything, this made the party much more lively! No one was just sitting watching the thing, but everyone commented on some of the pictures. It was also great during dinner. Oh, and it was a lot less than $1,200 and it was a professional photographer, not just a dude w/ camera!!!!
what videog. did u use?
MandM07-03-05
Posted:
Member since
Re: plasma or no plasma??
i loved mine!
lipglossjunky73
Posted:
Member since
Re: plasma or no plasma??
we are doing it - i am so excited abt it!!!
dbleplay17
Posted:
Member since
Re: plasma or no plasma??
we are doing it but we arent using plasmas we have those big projection tvs...but we might upgrade last minute we are going to decide closer to the wedding
Soon2BeMrsS
Posted:
Member since
Re: plasma or no plasma??
No I don't think it's worth it
SomethingBlu
Posted:
Member since
Re: plasma or no plasma??
My DH wanted them so badly...I was against them...and still am. No offense to those who had them or want them...but I feel like they're more suitable for a Sweet 16 than a wedding reception. We saved the dough (it would have been almost $2K though).