Sean-Preston

hold on i have to resize



removed pic just in case.

so cute, still a BIG OLE Britney fan, (yea yea I know most of you hate her)

They all look so good in these pictures.

I read someplace that the baby in this pic is really a doll. After looking at it. i think they are right.
SORRY

look at the babies face in the upper right pic and lower left corner pic.

also
look at the babies face in the pic with kevin. then look at the babies face in the pic right under it.


i am not an expert but i dont think babies can keep the same facial expression for a photo shoot!

NEW YORK (AP) - Britney Spears threatened to take legal action Friday after pictures of her newborn son popped up on the Internet, apparently stolen from a private photo shoot. At least two Web sites showed photos of Spears embracing her child, as well as a family portrait.

A statement released late Friday by Spears' record label, Jive Records, said the photos were swiped from a private photo session.

'Anyone who publishes, sells or otherwise exploits any of these images in any way will be subject to liability and damages for willful infringement of copyright, and will be liable for invasion of privacy,' the statement read.

remove that pic so nobody gets yelled at, please

shes so stupid....first its ok to take the pics, then she regrets it but then when its stolen, shes gonna sue people left and right

i think these celebs need their heads checked

---

Posted by mark'smama

look at the babies face in the upper right pic and lower left corner pic.

also
look at the babies face in the pic with kevin. then look at the babies face in the pic right under it.


i am not an expert but i dont think babies can keep the same facial expression for a photo shoot!

---

but also if you look they are the same pictures just cropped and laid out differently to make the collage, it is the same exact face because it is the same exact picture

sean preston is so cute, god bless him..

---

Posted by lilqtny

---

Posted by mark'smama

look at the babies face in the upper right pic and lower left corner pic.

also
look at the babies face in the pic with kevin. then look at the babies face in the pic right under it.


i am not an expert but i dont think babies can keep the same facial expression for a photo shoot!

---

but also if you look they are the same pictures just cropped and laid out differently to make the collage, it is the same exact face because it is the same exact picture

---

OMG I am such a dingbat.
I knew that some of them were the same pic but didn't realize that the ones i was talking about were. OOPS!!!!

(but i did here that the baby in the pics was a doll)

So she agreed now to publish them.

---

Posted by JPC1125

shes so stupid....first its ok to take the pics, then she regrets it but then when its stolen, shes gonna sue people left and right

---

How does that make her stupid? The article states that it was a private photo shoot. Regardless of peoples' feelings for her and regardless of her celebrity status she's still a person with a family. And people with families like to have some personal photographs, no?

---

Posted by BMD'sPeanut

---

Posted by JPC1125

shes so stupid....first its ok to take the pics, then she regrets it but then when its stolen, shes gonna sue people left and right

---

How does that make her stupid? The article states that it was a private photo shoot. Regardless of peoples' feelings for her and regardless of her celebrity status she's still a person with a family. And people with families like to have some personal photographs, no?

---

my comment was directed at the fact that she was willing to whore out her son to make some cash....that in itself is not a good mother- she should be protecting him from the public eye

---

Posted by JPC1125

---

Posted by BMD'sPeanut

---

Posted by JPC1125

shes so stupid....first its ok to take the pics, then she regrets it but then when its stolen, shes gonna sue people left and right

---

How does that make her stupid? The article states that it was a private photo shoot. Regardless of peoples' feelings for her and regardless of her celebrity status she's still a person with a family. And people with families like to have some personal photographs, no?

---

my comment was directed at the fact that she was willing to whore out her son to make some cash....that in itself is not a good mother- she should be protecting him from the public eye

---

the reason why she was upset that paparazzi took photographs of her son, is because she sold first photo rights to people magazine. the same thing happened with madonna--she didnt want any paparazzi photographs of her children because she made millions by selling photo rights to magazines like vanity fair.

---

Posted by MrsP2Be

So she agreed now to publish them.

---

That pic of her baby looks like a doll! Its a little scary