Post New Topic

Utah Woman Charged With Murdering Fetus

Original post by alina

http://www.ajc.com/news/content/news/ap/ap_story.html/National/AP.V6796.AP-Mother-Charged.html

Utah Woman Charged With Murdering Fetus
By ALEXANDRIA SAGE
Associated Press Writer


SALT LAKE CITY (AP)--As Melissa Ann Rowland's unborn twins got closer to birth, doctors repeatedly told her they would likely die if she did not have a Caesarean section. She refused, and one later was stillborn.

Authorities charged 28-year-old Rowland with murder on Thursday, saying she exhibited ``depraved indifference to human life,'' according to court documents. Prosecutors said Rowland didn't want to be scarred, and one nurse told police that Rowland said she would rather ``lose one of the babies than be cut like that.''

The case could affect abortion rights and open the door to the prosecution of mothers who smoke or don't follow their obstetrician's diet, said Marguerite Driessen, a law professor at Brigham Young University.

``It's very troubling to have somebody come in and say we're going to charge this mother for murder because we don't like the choices she made,'' she said.

Court documents did not list an address for Rowland, and she is not listed in telephone books for the Salt Lake City area. It could not immediately be determined whether she had an attorney.

Rowland was warned numerous times between Christmas and Jan. 9 that her unborn twins would likely die if she did not get immediate medical treatment, the documents allege. When she delivered them on Jan. 13, one survived and the other was stillborn.

The woman sought medical advice in December because she hadn't felt the fetuses move, documents said.

Regina Davis, a nurse at LDS Hospital in Salt Lake, told police that during a visit there, Rowland was recommended two hospitals to go to for immediate care. Rowland allegedly said she would rather have both twins die before she went to either of the suggested hospitals.

On Jan. 2, a doctor at LDS Hospital saw Rowland and recommended she immediately undergo a C-section based on the results of an ultrasound and the fetus' slowing heart rates. Rowland left after signing a document stating that she understood that leaving might result in death or brain injury to one or both twins, the doctor told police.

The same day, a nurse at Salt Lake Regional Hospital saw Rowland, who allegedly told her she had left LDS Hospital because the doctor wanted to cut her ``from breast bone to pubic bone,'' a procedure that would ``ruin her life.''

LDS Hospital can't comment on the case because of medical privacy issues and the pending court case, said spokesman Robert Pexton.

The doctor who performed an autopsy found that the fetus died two days before delivery and would have survived if Rowland had undergone a C-section when urged to do so. It was not immediately clear how far along Rowland was in her pregnancy.

She was charged in Salt Lake County with one first-degree felony count of criminal homicide. Rowland was being held on $250,000 bail at the Salt Lake County jail, and was scheduled to appear in court Tuesday.

If convicted, she could be sentenced to between five years and life in prison.

A spokesman for the district attorney, Kent Morgan, said Rowland is married and has other children, but he did not know how many.

``We are unable to find any reason other than the cosmetic motivations by the mother'' for her decision, Morgan said.

Caesarean sections usually involve delivery through a surgical incision in the abdomen and front wall of the uterus. Dr. Christian Morgan, a family practice doctor who regularly performs C-sections at the University of Utah Health Sciences Center, said he had never seen vertical skin incisions performed at LDS Hospital for a first-time C-section.

``Even when you need to get a baby out in minutes, it can still be done in the bikini incision,'' Christian Morgan said.


AP-NY-03-12-04 0855EST

Copyright 2004, The Associated Press. The information contained in the AP Online news report may not be published, broadcast or redistributed without the prior written authority of The Associated Press.

alina Posted:

Re: Utah Woman Charged With Murdering Fetus


Posted by kel2004


Posted by alina


Posted by kel2004


Posted by kelly4


Posted by michele31

I also had a c/s and it was the hardest decision I ever made. One I still have regrets over. BUT NO politican has a right to FORCE it on me.



I agree 100%! No one has the right to force anything on you! Yes, I don't agree about her choice, but it is HER body and no one should tell you what to do with it! We are still in america aren't we?



What about the baby's rights?



How can you know baby's rights, if its unable to survive or communicate with you? What if baby doesn't want to live? The fact is that nobody knows what the baby wants or doesn't want, but why should a baby have more rights than mom?



So equal rights doesn't apply to babies?



If a baby is still inside a woman's body, I don't believe it should have as much rights as if its out of the body, regardless of whether or not it can or can't survive.

I think what's inside of my body is totally mine, and nobody else should have the ability to dictate how I amto treat that baby or myself during pregnancy.
kel2004 Posted:

Re: Utah Woman Charged With Murdering Fetus


Posted by alina

If a baby is still inside a woman's body, I don't believe it should have as much rights as if its out of the body, regardless of whether or not it can or can't survive.

I think what's inside of my body is totally mine, and nobody else should have the ability to dictate how I amto treat that baby or myself during pregnancy.



Okay, well here is where we should just agree to disagree. I believe that life begins at conception. It would be easier if I didn't, but I do, and that is what drives my opinions. I think it is even more disturbing if the baby could survive outside the womb, and the mother still decides to kill it. (assuming no danger to mother)
alina Posted:

Re: Utah Woman Charged With Murdering Fetus

No problem, I'll agree to disagree
michele31 Posted:

Re: Utah Woman Charged With Murdering Fetus

heck, women do not have equal rights either.....

We also have no idea her mental capacity,what the doctors actually told her, her religious beliefs etc...
checka Posted:

Re: Utah Woman Charged With Murdering Fetus

This is just bad all around. They just said on the news that the surviving twin was adopted. Wow, that was fast. They didn't say put into foster care, they said adopted. I thought that was a little weird, no?

Tammy5-03 Posted:

Re: Utah Woman Charged With Murdering Fetus

I find this story horrifying for so many reasons. I personally am most distubed by the audacity of the government to interfere with a person's own autonomy. Nothing in medicine is clear-cut. If a person has normal intelligence, they should have the right to make decisions for themselves and their bodies. A c-section is a very safe and common procedure but it has many risks, the least of which is the scar. You can't force people to endanger their own lives. I happen to think this woman had psychiatric problems or something else wrong with her. I am sure everyone told her what the scar would actually look like so I doubt that she was someone who could reason properly. I am sorry that one of the babies died but I am not willing to risk my rights and the rights of women everywhere over it.

wenndypoo Posted:

Re: Utah Woman Charged With Murdering Fetus

Like I said, this is just a bad situation.
Morally, it is clear, but legally, it is ambiguos at best.

Sad, just sad.....
michele31 Posted:

Re: Utah Woman Charged With Murdering Fetus

All this when in Colorado they are allowing a women to be grilled about her sexual past because she said she was raped. If they allows this and it gets out in the press- which it will- women who rich, superstars or celebrities rape will never come forward. it is hard enough for a women to come forward. no ALL of us will need to fear our pasts being made public.

Jenn524 Posted:

Re: Utah Woman Charged With Murdering Fetus

While I think that she made a morally wrong choice, I don't think she should be charged with murder. If she gets convincted what's next? Women who smoke or drink during pregnancy are charged with murder if they lose the baby? Or women who don't eat the healthiest? Should they be punished? I think this can start something that could become scary. When you're pregnant you can be advised as to what's best for the health of your baby but I'm not sure that the government can force you.

I think you can make an argument for negligence and wonder about how fit a parent is going to be if they chose a high risk delivery because of a cosmetic reason. But I'm not sure she should be charged for murder.
michele31 Posted:

Re: Utah Woman Charged With Murdering Fetus

But what about women when a prego women is put on bedrest? If she decides to go to the Mall and as a result loses her baby should we be able to put her in prision?

I am NOT saying her decision was wise, or even medically sound. And I honestly don't think the Media knows she ONLY decided against the c/s because of a scar. Look at her- does she look like a vein women?
Xelindrya Posted:

Re: Utah Woman Charged With Murdering Fetus


Posted by WhatNow?


Posted by alina

This is one case where I am not sure where I stand...

At what point do the doctors have the right to tell you what to do? And who is to determine how valid the woman's reason's for not doing a c-section.

I am shocked that the lawsuit has been started, but I am also scared with regard to my own rights.



Alina, that is how I feel as well.

On one hand, I feel so bad for this life that didn't even have a chance to begin.

On another hand, if this is a cause for a lawsuit, where do it end? Soon we will be told in which position we are suppose to conceive that is best of the baby. Or better yet, every woman having a child after 35 will be charged with endangering her child’s health because technically, she does!

This is disturbing!




I agree.. they were so quick to sue.. im afraid for my own rights and the rights of my daughter and granddaughters.
michele31 Posted:

Re: Utah Woman Charged With Murdering Fetus

She has a history of mental illness as per MSNBC and has had c/s before.

Jenn524 Posted:

Re: Utah Woman Charged With Murdering Fetus

Long article, but interesting points:

THE PEOPLE VS MELISSA ANN ROWLAND

This is one that makes you sit down and think.

This is one that could go national.

This is the story of Baby Boy Rowland.

He’s a murder victim.

He was killed January 11 – two days before he was born.

The story, according to sketchy details yesterday, began about Christmastime. That’s when Melissa Ann Rowland went to the first of apparently three hospitals in Salt Lake City.

She was pregnant, great with child, but she hadn’t felt anything move inside her in a while.

So she went to the hospital to have them check and see if everything was all right. It kind of makes you wonder if this was her first prenatal care, if maybe she didn’t have a doctor of her own.

Details about her are few. One report is that she is married, 28 or 29, and may have other children.

At any rate, she went to the hospital and they told her that there was trouble, that there were two babies inside her – twins – and that they were in distress, that she needed to have an immediate cesarean section.

If she didn’t, one or both of the babies were apt to die.

She rejected this advice.

Every time she received it.

Because, according to charging documents, she apparently later returned to that hospital, and eventually to two others, and was told the same thing.

The babies are in trouble, serious trouble, and if you don’t have a c-section they’re going to die.

The allegation is that she thought the scar from the surgical removal of the babies would “ruin her life.” She didn’t want a c-section and she wasn’t going to have one.

That’s what she told a doctor on January 9.

Four days later she went into labor and delivered the twins vaginally.

Baby Boy Rowland was stillborn.

The autopsy showed he had died two days before.

And yesterday they charged her with murder.

The district attorney of Salt Lake County alleges that by failing to heed competent medical advice and deliver her children by cesarean section, thereby causing the death of one of them, Melissa Ann Rowland committed the crime of felony murder.

Isn’t that interesting.

Doesn’t that send your mind wandering in different directions.

It raises questions about, among other things, individual rights and prerogatives, the power of government and who gets to make health-care decisions.

And, of course, the abortion people on both sides are going to have hissy fits.

Here are some things to think about.

Can one person be forced to have a surgical procedure to save another person? This case claims that it is criminal for a woman not to have a surgery that may save her child’s life. So, I wonder if your sister needs a kidney transplant and will die without it and you are the only match, can you be charged with murder if you don’t donate and she dies?

Or could the state get a court order forcing you to donate your kidney?

If a woman has multiple babies in her womb, say four, and the statistics show that survival rates are far higher for twins than for quadruplets, can she be forced to abort two of them to save the remaining two? And if she does not abort two of them and they all are born premature and don’t survive, how many counts of murder would she be charged with?

Is a woman not free to choose how to have her babies? Can a woman who rejects a doctor’s advice to have a c-section be taken to court and ordered to have one?

Isn’t she, after all, the ultimate decider in matters involving her own body?

Law and precedent show that parents can be held liable for failing to provide health care procedures to their children, but can they now be held liable for failing to provide health care procedures to themselves?

If two people who can pass a fatal genetic disease to their children conceive anyway and a child is born who ends up having the genetic disease and consequent death sentence, have those parents murdered that child?

Does motive mitigate? If a woman is motivated to reject the c-section because of vanity, is that criminal, but if she chooses a vaginal birth for cultural or religious reasons, is that OK? What if she is just scared and dumb? What if she believes that if she doesn’t have her baby vaginally she isn’t a real woman?

What if she’s a hairy-legged earth mother who just always wanted to birth her baby conventionally?

Is ignoring a doctor’s advice criminal only when it has a bad outcome? If the doctor recommends something and you choose something else and the baby doesn’t die, have you still broken the law?

Are you legally obligated to always accept the best medical advice? Is there some law that compels you to accept medical care at all?

If you want to have your baby at home and there is a medical emergency during the delivery that can only be addressed at a hospital and the baby dies, have you murdered that baby? I mean, you’ve done a medically and statistically dangerous thing that resulted in the death of a child. Just like this woman. Should you be charged, just like this woman?

Can an unborn person be murdered? If so, why is abortion legal? If not, why is this woman charged?

Many states – including Utah – recognize that an unborn person can be the victim of a violent life-ending crime committed by someone other than the mother. If you shoot a pregnant woman and she loses the baby, you have committed a homicide against that baby.

But have we now decided that the mother can likewise be held criminally liable for what she has failed to do?

Will we next charge with neglect those women who smoke or drink during pregnancy? How about those who don’t take prenatal vitamins or have sufficient dietary levels of folic acid, or get regular doctor check-ups? Have they by their failure to do certain things criminally endangered their unborn babies?

What if your unborn child has a potentially fatal heart defect which can be surgically corrected in utero and you choose not to have the procedure – is that another case of murder?

If you used LSD 20 years ago and your child is born misshapen and unable to survive, can you be charged with a crime?

Those are the questions. Society is going to have to come up with the answers.

Sometimes babies die, and it is a terrible thing, but is it a criminal thing? That’s what we have to decide.

This woman can’t be understood. I’ve never met anyone who wouldn’t give their life for their child, and I can’t conceive of a woman doing anything other than immediately following this medical advice and opting for the c-section. It’s hard to find a woman who wouldn’t gladly die on the table if it meant her baby could live.

That’s how mothers are wired.

It’s clear that Melissa Ann Rowland was wrong. If things are as they appear, she is probably a cold, heartless, selfish monster.

But is she a murderer?

She may have broken God’s law, but has she broken man’s law?

The district attorney of Salt Lake County thinks so.

Now we’ll have to find out what the courts think.


- by Bob Lonsberry © 2004


Reply to this topic

Log in to reply or quote a post.