Wedding Themes...Does this make sense to you?

Wedding Themes...Does this make sense to you?

I am mentally going through our components for our wedding.. and I am beginning to doubt if they mesh well together.. here are the elements.. tell me your honest opinion..

BMs in Chocolate brown with champagne sash, MOH in champagne with chocolate brown sash.
Groomsmen in black tuxedo with champagne vest and tie.
BM BoKs - Light pink roses (18)
MOH BoK - Light pink & Ivory Vandella Roses (24)

CPs.. Tall are cherry blossoms, small are light pink tulips and ivory vandella roses..

I am not sure how it all goes together.. just trying to place it in my head.. seems like the light pink tulips may be out of place.. I dont have a photo of tulips and roses together.. if you have that can someone post .. Thanks again in advance..

Re: Wedding Themes...Does this make sense to you?

I dont know about mixing tulips with roses....i would keep every flower the same IMO

Re: Wedding Themes...Does this make sense to you?

I think that all of your colors mesh very well together!!! YOu do have a consitency going on so dont worry!! The only thing that I even slightly question is the tulips... but again... slightly ...I really think you are in good shape!!!

Re: Wedding Themes...Does this make sense to you?

thats exactly what I am concerned about.. its a very large small CP.. I think they are around 70ish flowers.. something like that.. half tulips, half roses.. it sounded wonderful originally.. thanks for the honest opinions..

Re: Wedding Themes...Does this make sense to you?

I think it all goes well together except maybe the tulips, but its a spring wedding and tulips say spring. LOVE the cherry blossom idea. If I had a spring wedding I would have done that. They were my favorite part of living in DC.

Re: Wedding Themes...Does this make sense to you?

All of those colors are beautiful together, but I agree with the tulips. It might look better to replace the tulips with light pink roses, then the cherry blossom can be the accent flower.