What are your top 3 smallish reception sites...

TattooAnkh Posted: Apr 24, 2007 12:38 AM

What are your top 3 smallish reception sites...

I've already seen 18 places, and I'm driving myself *crazy* afraid to miss out on the perfect one.

Since I've allocated only one more day of looking, I was hoping you girls you give me your top 3 favorite sites for small receptions (100-130 people). Places that are pretty for an Oct./Nov. wedding are a plus (i.e. fall foliage, and a pretty inside in case of inclement weather).

Thank you all so much for your help!!!!!

diva7531 Posted: Apr 24, 2007 06:49 AM

Re: What are your top 3 smallish reception sites...

HAve you looked at Smithtown Landing? They can accomodate smaller 50-75 in one room or up to 225 in the other room. I guarenteed 125 and am being treated like royalty. Good Luck with you r search, I hope you find the perfect hall.

HelenZ Posted: Apr 24, 2007 07:39 AM

Re: What are your top 3 smallish reception sites...

Douglaston Manor (my room has a guarantee of 150, but they have another room)

Sans Souci
Swan Club
The Metropolitan

vintagegirl Posted: Apr 24, 2007 07:57 AM

Re: What are your top 3 smallish reception sites...

I love the place I am getting married.. its West Sayville country club

DrWho Posted: Apr 24, 2007 08:00 AM

Re: What are your top 3 smallish reception sites...

Try the Soundview or, if you're looking really small, The Bartlett House holds 30 (both in Greenport). Check here for a whole bunch out east.

Kara and Todd Posted: Apr 24, 2007 08:08 AM

Re: What are your top 3 smallish reception sites...

Sans Souci would be my top choice for a small wedding, though unfortunately you either have to have your CH outside or on the dance floor of the ball room. (They do sort of close off one part of the room, though, so you can't see the whole thing)

The Metropolitan has a minimum of 140, so that wouldn't work for you unless you did it on a Friday or Sunday (when the minimum is 120) or negotiated the minimum down. I would, however, look into the Metropolitan CLUB, which is owned / operated by the same people - just a smaller venue.

My brother had 100 people at Stewart Manor CC and it was nice -- the food was very good, but the decor wasn't personally my style.

rachel212 Posted: Apr 24, 2007 08:45 AM

Re: What are your top 3 smallish reception sites...

I'm getting married at Three Village Inn and I'm the only wedding and only 80 people!!!

cookiemonster Posted: Apr 24, 2007 08:50 AM

Re: What are your top 3 smallish reception sites...

milleridge cottage
fox hollow
roslyn claremont hotel
woodlands

Autumn08 Posted: Apr 24, 2007 09:00 AM

Re: What are your top 3 smallish reception sites...

Fox Hollow. It's beautiful in the fall!

rkl1130 Posted: Apr 24, 2007 09:02 AM

nlghttrain Posted: Apr 24, 2007 09:46 AM

Re: What are your top 3 smallish reception sites...

Im getting married at beach club estate, its directly on Lake Ronkonkoma, so beautiful

maybride75 Posted: Apr 24, 2007 09:50 AM

Re: What are your top 3 smallish reception sites...

1. three village inn
2. beach club estates
3. the metriopolitan club

Shorty McBride Posted: Apr 24, 2007 10:24 AM

Re: What are your top 3 smallish reception sites...

Posted by Autumn08

Fox Hollow. It's beautiful in the fall!

agreed!

I'm only expecting 120 people.

dancerandchef Posted: Apr 24, 2007 10:47 AM

Re: What are your top 3 smallish reception sites...

Posted by vintagegirl

I love the place I am getting married.. its West Sayville country club

I second West Sayville Country Club. That is where we are getting married. It's so beautiful and everyone who works there is so helpful. It is perfect for an autumn wedding. I hope that we helped you out.

~dancer and chef~

michspch Posted: Apr 24, 2007 10:49 AM

Re: What are your top 3 smallish reception sites...

My cousin's getting married at the GWM which holds UP TO 150...

Spelldizzy Posted: Apr 24, 2007 10:55 AM

Re: What are your top 3 smallish reception sites...

The smaller room upstairs at Westbury Manor...I dont know the name of it, but its gorgeous and the grounds at WM are beautiful all year round....

AS Posted: Apr 24, 2007 11:01 AM

Re: What are your top 3 smallish reception sites...

Posted by Spelldizzy

The smaller room upstairs at Westbury Manor...I dont know the name of it, but its gorgeous and the grounds at WM are beautiful all year round....

The upstairs room is called the Hill Room, its really nice for a small function and it has its own balcony on the roof

Spelldizzy Posted: Apr 24, 2007 11:04 AM

Re: What are your top 3 smallish reception sites...

Posted by MPAS

Posted by Spelldizzy

The smaller room upstairs at Westbury Manor...I dont know the name of it, but its gorgeous and the grounds at WM are beautiful all year round....

The upstairs room is called the Hill Room, its really nice for a small function and it has its own balcony on the roof

Ticky did you see the portrait studio upstairs yet? Me and FH went there yesterday to make another deposit and we went and sat down in the EMPTY Manor Room (remember the showcase )Its still surreal...

SoontobeMrsH Posted: Apr 24, 2007 11:09 AM

Re: What are your top 3 smallish reception sites...

Posted by Kara and Todd

Sans Souci would be my top choice for a small wedding, though unfortunately you either have to have your CH outside or on the dance floor of the ball room. (They do sort of close off one part of the room, though, so you can't see the whole thing)

The Metropolitan has a minimum of 140, so that wouldn't work for you unless you did it on a Friday or Sunday (when the minimum is 120) or negotiated the minimum down. I would, however, look into the Metropolitan CLUB, which is owned / operated by the same people - just a smaller venue.

My brother had 100 people at Stewart Manor CC and it was nice -- the food was very good, but the decor wasn't personally my style.

WE're having oyr wedding @ the Metropolitian Club, the min is 60 for a sat night in June!! The max is 130 tho