I'm deciding between the different packages, and am wondering if having a second photographer in the Pink rose package is worth it, over the Red Rose package. They also seem to be priced much higher than most videographers. Since I'm only going to be in NY for the weekend I'm hoping to get your opinions as to whether they really stand out. Thanks.
bump
I had the 2 camera coverage & it was worth every penny. FM me if you need more info.
Im going with one camera coverage because I have a small guest list and dont see the need for two cameras, maybe if I had over 150 I would consider a second camera, but I have been to weddings with 100 people and one camera is GREAT, you can tell them what youd like them to focus on, certain relatives, etc. We booked wild rose, they are GREAT to work with so far, I am 100% sure of the great job they will do, they are a bit more than other companies, but I am SURE they are worth it..when I met them in real, they showed me several videos, and they are absolutley beautiful!!!! They also showed me videos of a wedidng at my reception hall, so i could kind of see it, they do beautful work, but again, I think the size of your guest list may determine whether you need a secodn camera, kepe in mind, some of your guests will also be taking home videos, between those, the professional video and the thousands of pictures you will have from guests and professioanl photographers, you will get everything captured!!! Good luck!!
Thanks Alicia, I've been debating the 2nd camera thing. My guest list will be less than 150, and I think your right that it might be overkill. (for my wedding) Fortunately this has been the easiest vendor to pick so far :)
Oh thats !!! I sent ya FM!!
I didn't get the FM, just the reply on the board.
we're having less than 150 and are only having one camera as well. At first we weren't even sure we were going to have a video at all- so one is good for us!
