Would it be wrong to...

Jelli84 Posted: Jul 30, 2008 04:01 PM

Would it be wrong to...

have 2 photographers from different companies to cover my wedding?

Im a Pepper Posted: Jul 30, 2008 04:04 PM

Re: Would it be wrong to...

I don't think it's wrong, but I would think they might get in each other's way since they haven't worked together in the past.

PegaLega Posted: Jul 30, 2008 04:07 PM

Re: Would it be wrong to...

I dont think it would be wrong but definitely speak to your original photographer~some photogs wont work with someone from another company.

shell1879 Posted: Jul 30, 2008 04:10 PM

Re: Would it be wrong to...

thats a great idea they could have different styles and catch different things but def let each one know about the other beforehand so it doesn't cause problems on the big day

Caramelatta Posted: Jul 30, 2008 04:11 PM

Re: Would it be wrong to...

I feel that they will be compeating to be in each others space...Trying to capture the best shot. I personally wouldnt do it. I dont want to think of my pics being ruined or not coming out as great as i thought it would.

jaydan915 Posted: Jul 30, 2008 04:21 PM

Re: Would it be wrong to...

I would ask your main photographer first. We wanted 2 and our mian guy recommended a photojournalistic guy he works with all the time. So at least they worked together before. You don't want them stepping on each others toes.

misswitty Posted: Jul 30, 2008 04:28 PM

Re: Would it be wrong to...

definitely read the fine print in the contract - I know mine won't allow any other company - they won't even allow ZAP shots from the DJ because they claim it gets in the way of them doing their job. See if your main photographer has a PJ (photojournalist) you can use.