WW's new poster child

Danielle&Scott Posted: Nov 17, 2003 10:21 AM

WW's new poster child

stacedz Posted: Nov 17, 2003 10:48 AM

Re: WW's new poster child

I don't see anything...

stacedz Posted: Nov 17, 2003 10:50 AM

Re: WW's new poster child

Oh I see....Renee Zellweger...oh please, why don't they use someone who HAS struggled with her weight all her life. What is scary is that by any means she isn't overweight from the weight she gained for BJD...she is actually perfect for her height AND was too thin at her starting weight!!

Danielle&Scott Posted: Nov 17, 2003 11:12 AM

Re: WW's new poster child

Yup....I cannot believe that they are going to use her as a spokeswoman

casg Posted: Nov 17, 2003 11:37 AM

Re: WW's new poster child

i wish i could get paid

ChristineC68 Posted: Nov 17, 2003 04:38 PM

Re: WW's new poster child

I think she would be a terrible representative for WW! She gained the weight ON PURPOSE and now she's going to be paid $3.3 Million to lose it?? I really hope she donates that money to charity.

What-Now Posted: Nov 17, 2003 04:57 PM

Re: WW's new poster child

she is soooo nasty loooking, no matter how much she weights! EWWWWWW She always has a really weird expression on her face, like she just ate a whole really bitter lemon!

stacedz Posted: Nov 17, 2003 06:51 PM

Re: WW's new poster child

Posted by WhatNow?

she is soooo nasty loooking, no matter how much she weights! EWWWWWW She always has a really weird expression on her face, like she just ate a whole really bitter lemon!

OMG, you ARE RIGHT!!

jenny2penny Posted: Nov 17, 2003 07:55 PM

Re: WW's new poster child

I agree, she always has that consipated look.

mlp924 Posted: Nov 17, 2003 08:28 PM

Re: WW's new poster child

Gee with $110,000 per pound I bet she could get a drill seargent to follow her around and stop her from eating period! This takes the cake

Maribelle7777 Posted: Nov 17, 2003 08:49 PM

Re: WW's new poster child

WW will be a 'sell out' in my eyes if that's true.

That's just horrible. How about asking one of the normal 'Janes' or 'Joes' out there to lose weight for that kind of money? That would be more interesting.

Fran M Posted: Nov 18, 2003 09:26 AM

Re: WW's new poster child

I wonder if she has to pay the weekly meeting fee?

Danielle&Scott Posted: Nov 18, 2003 10:31 AM

Re: WW's new poster child

Posted by Fran M

I wonder if she has to pay the weekly meeting fee?

HAHAHA...I almost just fell off my chair...
Scott

cooky11111 Posted: Nov 18, 2003 11:03 AM

Re: WW's new poster child

Wow if I was paid that much, but I would be losing a lot faster then I am now! LOL

stacedz Posted: Nov 18, 2003 12:55 PM

Re: WW's new poster child

Me too!!!

Kathy116 Posted: Nov 18, 2003 05:31 PM

Re: WW's new poster child

I also agree that she's NOT the right WW spokeswoman.

I watched her on the View not too long ago, and they were asking her how she lost all that Bridget Jones weight she said:

'It's not that hard when you take a month off, stay in a luxury hotel in Hawaii...run everyday, and have all your meals cooked for you'.

She wasn't being snotty, she just meant that as a celebrity, when you have a lot of money, it's not as difficult as the regular person.

And like everyone else said, she was always skinny, except for that specific role.

shamma Posted: Nov 18, 2003 06:18 PM

Re: WW's new poster child

Why can't I see anything

shamma Posted: Nov 18, 2003 06:19 PM

Re: WW's new poster child

Oh I see it now, does she need to lose weight??

shamma Posted: Nov 18, 2003 06:23 PM

Re: WW's new poster child

I just read it, they are going to pay her and they paid her to gain weight, wait here, hold up, what is wrong with this picture. Shouldn't they choose someone like say Scott who is a real person *shakes head*

stacedz Posted: Nov 18, 2003 08:02 PM

Re: WW's new poster child

But the point is with the weight she gained for the movie SHE ISN'T OVERWEIGHT!!! She was actually underweight to start off with. She is like a size 2 normally and went to a size 10 maybe? This just makes me mad!