1 or 2 Photographers???
Original post by MayDay2010
Hi, I was wondering if 1 photographer would be enough for a wedding of about 150 people? Or should I go with 2? What are most people doing 1 or 2? Thanks.
Re: 1 or 2 Photographers???
Re: 1 or 2 Photographers???
We are having 2 the main photog and the asst. who also takes pics. It's the only way they do it-it wasn't an option. I like it because they can cover us from 2 different angles esp during the ceremony.
Re: 1 or 2 Photographers???
I have heard that if you have over 175, they reccomend 2.
Re: 1 or 2 Photographers???
We're having one regular photographer but then we do also have one through the DJ for the zap shots, so I guess that's 2 then!
Re: 1 or 2 Photographers???
2 were included in our package
Re: 1 or 2 Photographers???
we are having two but that is mainly due to the fact that the company we went with only works that way. though, i really have grown to appreciate it because i like the idea of each of us (me and fh) having a photog with us before the ceremony. i also have a large family and like that both photogs can be taking pictures of different groups simultaneously.
Re: 1 or 2 Photographers???
You should have 1 photographer and 1 assistant who will do the photojournalist pics - the empty room, close up of rings,e tc.
Re: 1 or 2 Photographers???
Most of the photographers we looked at said that anything under 200 people is okay with 1 photographer. We're having a big wedding so we'll be getting 2 because of that. With one, you may miss some shots such as the groom's face when you walk down the aisle (b/c the photographer will be on you - the second one will typically get that shot). You may want to see if your photographer can get you a second one for an hourly rate, where you'd just pay the second for the hour during the ceremony.