I don't feel I ever attacked you, but maybe you felt I did. Being that I was one of the people that was posting on this thread last night I felt I should respond. I never once said there was anything wrong with having a full mass. I only explained why FH & I compromised with a ceremony in the church. I wanted to get married on the beach in a non-religious ceremony, he wanted a full mass, hence the compromise. Your post on the other hand stated that people who weren't willing to commit to the mass shouldn't be marrying in a catholic church. Maybe that wasn't what you meant to say or it was misunderstood, but that was how it came across. Connotation and meaning get lost in text sometimes. This is why FH & I NEVER discuss anything important on IM. ALWAYS leads to a fight.
![]()
Religion is a touchy subject. It is a very personal matter (as it should be) between oneself and the higher power of your choosing. Any discussion that gets into actual beliefs is bound to get complicated. All you have to do is look the middle east to see the far reaching effects of not agreeing on religion.
no, no, no, thats not what I was saying and I'm almost afraid to clarify for fear that it will once again get blown out of proportion. I just feel that I'm hearing alot of 'well neither of us is religious but we are doing it for the family'. If it's that one is from one religion and the other partner is say...jewish...then fine...I don't have any opinions in regards to that. but when the full mass is negated simply because people are afraid it will be a bore...I don't agree with that. I don't agree with when the church becomes as mima called it...a pitstop. again...this is MY opinion.
I also didn't understand why two people who had no belief in god would get married in a church. I can understand a compromise for FH or not doing FM because it is an interfaith or whatever. But my feeling was that if both parties in the relationship are non religious, why get married in a church? in that case...yes...to me...it seems like the ceremony is more for show than a ceremony of spiritual and holy substance, this I don't agree with...I feel its using the church. I wasn't saying this to offend angl2001, it's just my opinion and if u'd like to discuss it with me further and help me understand your point of view I'm always open...but It wasn't meant to attack or offend you in particular.
in general my point is this. a church is not a place for pretty pictures or for you to be the center of attention and make your grand entrance or fulfill your greatest cinderella fantasies. it's a holy place, and I don't agree with people who don't respect the holyness of a church.
my thing is ... if its a decision between you and FH...fine...but if ur doing it to please the masses, or if ur not doing a full mass ONLY because you're in a rush to get to RH and party or bc you are more concerned with the picture taking and all the superficial stuff that comes along with a wedding, then I don't agree with that because I feel its placing too much emphasis on materialistic things and its like people are forgetting the church is most important part.
FM might not be for everybody I don't expect everyone to believe in what I believe or agree with what I do. like I said if u believe in something, own it...don't change it on the most important day of your life just to please your guests. it's not about them anyway. thats just how I feel...not meant to offend.
also, that post wasn't directed at you...there was discussion back and forth between a few in which I was reffered to in a rude, accusatory or mocking manner and I didn't appreciate this getting to that level