I cant believe Jessica Simpson & Nick Are over

Do you think he should get half of her money?

---

Posted by lcherian

i think so! normal everyday people would have their assets split equally, so why should they be treated any differently?

---

I agree.

Well, they didn't have a prenup and she supposedly made $35 million last year. In CA, the laws says 50-50 when you divorce so technically, yes, he should.
Personally -it doesn't matter to me; they're well off financially either way.

of course he should get half the money and alimoney- if it was the other way around - no one would question it

that is the law in cali- 50/50

I am sure she spent most of it- and I doubt she made $35M last year

the misreport her earnings from the dessert line- the line made $35 in sales- not profit

---

Posted by Beth1210

of course he should get half the money and alimoney- if it was the other way around - no one would question it

that is the law in cali- 50/50

I am sure she spent most of it- and I doubt she made $35M last year

the misreport her earnings from the dessert line- the line made $35 in sales- not profit

---

Beth, you mean you don't think that she hit pay dirt with her stellar performance in the Dukes of Hazzard???

NO!!!!

I believe whatever they had PRIOR to the marriage should be theirs and any income earned DURING the marriage should be split 50-50. But that's just me. And YES, I believe the same thing if the roles were reversed. I don't think it's fair to split finances that were earned prior to marriage in any instance. So many people marry for money these days, it's disgusting. Look at Britney and her husband. Talk about ridiculous!!! But hey this is just my opinion, which means nothing to no one but me!!!

[Beth, you mean you don't think that she hit pay dirt with her stellar performance in the Dukes of Hazzard???

---

I think she made about $500,000 for dukes- about $499,000 more then she was worth!

I love Jess- but not for her acting skills

---

Posted by MrsFelix

NO!!!!

I believe whatever they had PRIOR to the marriage should be theirs and any income earned DURING the marriage should be split 50-50. But that's just me. And YES, I believe the same thing if the roles were reversed. I don't think it's fair to split finances that were earned prior to marriage in any instance. So many people marry for money these days, it's disgusting. Look at Britney and her husband. Talk about ridiculous!!! But hey this is just my opinion, which means nothing to no one but me!!!

---

he had more before marriage- the 50/50 is only own what was earned during

and let's face it - if she didn't marry him- and make newlyweds- she would be broke and working at Mickey D's now!

---

Posted by Beth1210

[Beth, you mean you don't think that she hit pay dirt with her stellar performance in the Dukes of Hazzard???

---

I think she made about $500,000 for dukes- about $499,000 more then she was worth!

I love Jess- but not for her acting skills

---

I'm with you!

---

Posted by Lindachancy

So you mean to tell me if your husband sat on his behind for 3 years while you were working your A-- off and you wanted to leave him he should get half of your money ? I'm sorry I dont agree.

---

We may not like it, but it is a California state law.

---

Posted by Beth1210

---

Posted by MrsFelix

NO!!!!

I believe whatever they had PRIOR to the marriage should be theirs and any income earned DURING the marriage should be split 50-50. But that's just me. And YES, I believe the same thing if the roles were reversed. I don't think it's fair to split finances that were earned prior to marriage in any instance. So many people marry for money these days, it's disgusting. Look at Britney and her husband. Talk about ridiculous!!! But hey this is just my opinion, which means nothing to no one but me!!!

---

he had more before marriage- the 50/50 is only own what was earned during

and let's face it - if she didn't marry him- and make newlyweds- she would be broke and working at Mickey D's now!

---

Are you sure about the 50/50 for only during the marriage? Isn't it on the whole enchilada regardless? Isn't that what pre-nups are for, to protect what they already had prior to?

Before - theirs
During - 50/50
After - theirs

I just think it's fair that way that's all.

---

Posted by Beth1210

[Beth, you mean you don't think that she hit pay dirt with her stellar performance in the Dukes of Hazzard???

---

I think she made about $500,000 for dukes- about $499,000 more then she was worth!

I love Jess- but not for her acting skills

---

I still haven't seen it. I love John Schneider the original Dukes!!!

I love Jess too for her voice. Her acting though, I didn't want to be subjected too after all the bad reviews.

Her father announced it on the Wednesday before Thanksgiving, so all the people who work for Access Hollywood, Extra and the tabloids had to go into work on Thanksgiving and the next day.
He kind of blamed the media for causing them to separate so he wanted to stick it to them for the holidays.

i dont think they are really going to get a 'divorce.' i think its a seperation at this point only.

jmo

yes I agree he should definately get half. If she didn't marry him she would still be a C list star.

And whoever said Nick sat on his behind please. Newlyweds is what made the money start coming in the door so he did his part.

If you get married with no prenup you agree to split 50% to me. They both know the laws where they live.