i had a good experience with burtons and my cousin booked them for his wedding, but i liked the attention to detail from jack. he is is super nice and really knows his flowers!
aliasPook
Posted:
Member since
Re: Who's cheaper......
I am not too sure, but my sister used Burtons and well as quite a few of her friends and tehy came out beautifully. My flowers from Burtons were very inexpensive.
all boutoneeieres 1 vase with 2 dozen roses for teh placecard table
mattnnic327
Posted:
Member since
Re: Who's cheaper......
Laurie.. what are you doing for your tables? I know you are having a lot of people so thats where its going ot get expensive for me.. Ill probably have like 20 tables..yikes!!!
danigirl0
Posted:
Member since
Re: Who's cheaper......
those who used jack and rose...what did you love about them? do they have a nice variety?
tracyg
Posted:
Member since
Re: Who's cheaper......
the only reason i'm hesitant to go with Jack and Rose is that i didn't see many hydrangea bouquet pics. I want to see what he can do with them before i pick him. I know he'll do a great job... but i'm just a worry wart!! so if anyone has any pics with hydrangeas in them... show em! (i'm probably going with him... i'm too lazy to see anyone else at this point, and he did have great prices and was a great guy!!)
cw0904
Posted:
Member since
Re: Who's cheaper......
Cheaper and better service would be Jack & Rose. I didn't choose them for flowers but they are good.
palebride
Posted:
Member since
Re: Who's cheaper......
jack and rose is pretty inexpensive as well - you might want to go check them both out. from waht i hear - you can' t lose with either of them!
palebride
Posted:
Member since
Re: Who's cheaper......
jack and rose had a huge variety because he gets flowers from all ove the world - he can get you pretty much any type of flower that you desire!
jenny2penny
Posted:
Member since
Re: Who's cheaper......
I found J&R better for the money
pschica
Posted:
Member since
Re: Who's cheaper......
we chose jack and rose!
americanpolice
Posted:
Member since
Re: Who's cheaper......
I've been to both in the past 2 weeks. Burtons gave me more for my money than J&R. Some of the differences are: J&R is giving me 15 roses in the girls bo-ks while Burtons was giving me 25 (!!!) And I am getting 37 bout. for just our family members and J&R is giving me carnations, but Burton's giving me roses. However, I still cant make my decision, because both are great florists, and this is a tough one. It seems that more people prefer J&R, so I am leaning more towards them.
HearzBellz
Posted:
Member since
Re: Who's cheaper......
Jack & rose gave me a better price than Burton's & I really love Jack's personality
p&a91203
Posted:
Member since
Re: Who's cheaper......
Cheaper.... hate that word... how about less expensive! I would say Burtons! They will def give the most for your money without sacrificing quality. They have been a pleasure to do business so far!
