Post New Topic

C-sections...

Original post by Melissa

I won't be finding out until Friday on what the birthing plan is. That is if he doesn't come by then. (I'm hoping he does! ) They'll be checking approx. how big he is. They'll suggest a C-section at a certain weight to avoid certain risks and problems. So, at 36 weeks supposedly he was 8.5 lbs. So at the sonogram this week I'll be just over 39 weeks. I can't imagine him only gaining 1/2 - 1 lb in a few weeks, when the last estimate he gained 3.5 lbs in a few weeks. Anyway, I still don't know how I feel about a C-section, but for those ladies that have had one, could you fill me in, in what I can expect, good and bad? If you want you can forum mail me. Thanks so much!

WithThisRing Posted:

Re: C-sections...


Posted by jennbaby


Posted by Lee

No, I didn't have the traditional 'giving birth' experience, but I still gave birth to a gorgeous healthy baby and that is all that matters.



Lee, how beautifully said. That's all I am sure any of us wish for when it's our turn!

Thats all I wish for!!



Well said
jennbaby Posted:

Re: C-sections...

Imagin thank you for your input, it's well appreciated.!!!!!!!

I myself never knew someone who took 2 weeks to recover from a c section, but i know everyone is different. I am sure its not easy either. I am just saying...
I love reading this thread, it is so informative!
shamma Posted:

Re: C-sections...

I have known people who have done c-sections and they tell me clear and plain their next child will be a scheduled c-section.

I have never been pregnant or no have I ever been thru labor, but I know one thing for certain, when I get preggo, no matter how the baby comes, I will take it, as long as we are both safe and sound.

It doesn't lessen the fact that some women want the whole vaginal birth experience or feel bad if they did not get that.

My gf said if she could have had a c-section she would have taken it with her second child, she said the pain she felt with the first one, if it could have been avoided with her second she would have taken the dr's up on it.

I have never met anyone so afraid of pain like her. I wish each and everyone a safe and easy and pain free delivery no matter how your baby comes. I pray that both mommy and baby does well.
MichelleW Posted:

Re: C-sections...

This is only MY OPINION

My c-section was not a textbook case, I am one of the few who epidurals do not work on, (I found out the hard way!!) & unfortunately had to get general anesthesia to deliver Brandon.

I was already past my due date, my cervix was not dilating and he was not engaging. The Dr scheduled me to be induced, before he started the pitocin, he did a sono and had concerns that the baby was large in the shoulders and I MIGHT have a hard time delivering. I asked him what is the BEST thing for my baby, he advised the c-section and I never looked back. Bran was 9lb 6oz 22 1/2 inches long.

My only regret was that I did not get to hold him immediately after since I was knocked out, but other than that I PERSONALLY did not feel cheated by not delivering

LOL I pretty much refused all the pain meds, but the first step out of the bed the next morning is a BIOTCH

StayandJohn Posted:

Re: C-sections...


Posted by jennbaby


Posted by Lee

No, I didn't have the traditional 'giving birth' experience, but I still gave birth to a gorgeous healthy baby and that is all that matters.



Lee, how beautifully said. That's all I am sure any of us wish for when it's our turn!

Thats all I wish for!!




I agree
Claud2001 Posted:

Re: C-sections...


Posted by JustJodi

right now I wouldnt care if they had to pull him out of my mouth..
Im sooooooooooooooooooooo hurting



Awww....you poor thing, Jodi! Hang in there....he will be here soon!!!!
anna Posted:

Re: C-sections...

Imagin-thanks for the input I agree with most of it and appreciate your honesty and words of advice coming right from the medical field.

Jodi-your comment did have me laughing, even picturing it !! Hugs, mommy!

Lee Posted:

Re: C-sections...

Imagin - that was very interesting coming from someone in the field...I appreciated hearing that too...just to add, my arms were 'tied' down but it was just for monitors, etc. etc. - not a big deal. My hubby was by my head the whole time being the sweetest guy on earth!! And he was told to stand up to watch them pull Ryan out and he got to tell me that it was a boy! I will never ever forget that moment!!

Jodi - I remember feeling that way - I was begging people in my office to just GET IT OUT!! Soon, soon.... s to you!!
michele31 Posted:

Re: C-sections...

I did TONS of reseach on with ICAN which is a c-section support/awareness organization before my surgery. MANY women had their arms routinely tied down. MANY women, including myself, were very upset over the need for a cathadore (sp?) and each women that I personally know that had a c-section needed more help afterwards as compared with women I know who had v-births. Of course, there are many women who have v-births that are difficult too.


While I always appreciate a medical point of view I don't feel it was fair at all to say my information or suggestions were false. Y
You can go on the ICAN site and speak to hundreds of womens who discuss these topics. I never pretend to be a doctor or nurse or even a healthcare professional but I can tell you that I had to REQUEST my arms not be tied down and at first the doctors and nurses did not like the idea at all. For me this was a huge problem. I couldn't stand the idea of being tied down. For some, it might not be a big deal at all.
You can also read from hundred of womens that were told that they could never deliver vaginally a certain size baby only to have a VBAC with their next baby, that was even bigger than the first. Again, I am sure there are exceptions but something to think about.
But I think it is important that patients have know that they can do research and then request what is best for them. Of course, as in ANY medical situation there are emergencies and other issues to deal with.

And while I venture to say ALL women are happy and healthy to have a healthy baby having a disappointing birth experience is also something that is very common. It is even discussed in A girlfriend's guide to the first year of motherhood- which is NOT a medical book at all. There are tons of c-section support groups/sites to help women, who like me, feel incomplete. Now many women prefer c-sections and I know that but you might just want to consider another point of view on the subject. I am not alone in my feelings.

I also think hospital policy may be different. I actually had some male resident OB try to do a vaginal exam on me that morning. I told him that I only allow women OBs to exam me plus I didn't even know who the heck he was. When my doctor came in and he told her I wouldn't allow him to do the exam she said, 'But she is having a c-section in a few hours and we KNOW she is not in labor already. She doesn't need one' So even different doctors vary with their policies/procedures.

And I didn't see my baby for several minutes because she was being examed behind me and I could hear her crying and people kept telling me how cute Molly was but I couldn't even see her. Now maybe in some places you see the baby earlier than I did, but this is what they did in my hospital.

And Anna, well I am not going to start a tit-for-tat fight with you. Whatever you want to say or quote feel free and enjoy your posting.
Claud2001 Posted:

Re: C-sections...

Just for the mere sake of another point of view on catheters...I had a difficult vaginal birth and was given a catheter before and after Paul's birth.

The catheter before the birth was put in before my epidural and was NOT painful or uncomfortable AT ALL. I had to have one b/c I wouldn't be able to get up and walk to the bathroom after the epidural took effect.

After Paul was born, it was re-inserted and I can honestly say that I was darn thankful - mostly b/c I did experience a slight laceration during the birth and was terrified that going pee-pee would burn the heck out of my stitched area

So, being catheterized is not always a bad or unpleasant option to have.
Tammy5-03 Posted:

Re: C-sections...

I can't resist even though I told myself I would not join in this post. I am not a mother so I won't pretend to tell any of you anything about your emotions related to a c-section or vaginal birth. Every hospital and/or physican can have different policies so that is why so many people have different experiences. I think every woman should educate herself about all possibilities but she should know that some things are not in her control. I have seen patients have their arms tied down, its not common but its done. The catheter is not optional-you must have it for surgery. However, most of the time you can have it after the spinal or epidural. I also don't think its that painful but if it matters to you, it doesn't hurt to ask. I know it interferes with bonding but I don't think mothers should hold their babies immediately or breastfeed immediately in the OR. They should be assessed first by the pediatricians and given back to the moms later. These babies often need a little extra help and that is the priority.
My personal and professional opinion is that all women with supposedly big babies should be allowed to labor, especially for the first baby. This is what we call an 'untested pelvis' I don't know what you can do until you do it. I delivered a 10lb, 14 oz baby and the mom was average size. Ultrasound in the 3rd trimester is not that reliable either. But if your labor does not progress appropriately-there are time limits- that is a reason for section. If the baby is truly too big, you won't go anywhere in labor. I don't believe in elective c-sections-don't have one if you don't need one. Most go very smoothly and have little complications. The recovery is usually not that bad. I am going to scare some of you now so I warn you in advance. Some women do have complications-infections, excessive bleeding, damage to the bladder or bowel, etc. Its also not the first c-section that is so bad, its the repeat c-sections that can be a disaster. You hope to avoid these disasters by preventing the first one. Some women have a lot of scar tissue so the repeat c-section can be very dangerous, even life-threatening. The risks go up with each additional c-section.
Personally, I hope to have a vaginal delivery but if I NEED a c-section it would be fine. I work in a very high-risk hospital, and I have seen so many bad outcomes that I can't even begin to worry about something as small as the mode of delivery. I mean no offense to Michele or anyone else who is disappointed in their birth experience. A normal delivery is an awe-inspiring thing, that's why I work in the field. But from my admittedly skewed perspective, its not everything.
shamma Posted:

Re: C-sections...


Posted by Tammy5/03

I can't resist even though I told myself I would not join in this post. I am not a mother so I won't pretend to tell any of you anything about your emotions related to a c-section or vaginal birth. Every hospital and/or physican can have different policies so that is why so many people have different experiences. I think every woman should educate herself about all possibilities but she should know that some things are not in her control. I have seen patients have their arms tied down, its not common but its done. The catheter is not optional-you must have it for surgery. However, most of the time you can have it after the spinal or epidural. I also don't think its that painful but if it matters to you, it doesn't hurt to ask. I know it interferes with bonding but I don't think mothers should hold their babies immediately or breastfeed immediately in the OR. They should be assessed first by the pediatricians and given back to the moms later. These babies often need a little extra help and that is the priority.
My personal and professional opinion is that all women with supposedly big babies should be allowed to labor, especially for the first baby. This is what we call an 'untested pelvis' I don't know what you can do until you do it. I delivered a 10lb, 14 oz baby and the mom was average size. Ultrasound in the 3rd trimester is not that reliable either. But if your labor does not progress appropriately-there are time limits- that is a reason for section. If the baby is truly too big, you won't go anywhere in labor. I don't believe in elective c-sections-don't have one if you don't need one. Most go very smoothly and have little complications. The recovery is usually not that bad. I am going to scare some of you now so I warn you in advance. Some women do have complications-infections, excessive bleeding, damage to the bladder or bowel, etc. Its also not the first c-section that is so bad, its the repeat c-sections that can be a disaster. You hope to avoid these disasters by preventing the first one. Some women have a lot of scar tissue so the repeat c-section can be very dangerous, even life-threatening. The risks go up with each additional c-section.
Personally, I hope to have a vaginal delivery but if I NEED a c-section it would be fine. I work in a very high-risk hospital, and I have seen so many bad outcomes that I can't even begin to worry about something as small as the mode of delivery. I mean no offense to Michele or anyone else who is disappointed in their birth experience. A normal delivery is an awe-inspiring thing, that's why I work in the field. But from my admittedly skewed perspective, its not everything.



THanks for posting Tammy
anna Posted:

Re: C-sections...

Michele31, ALthough you are MORE THAN entitled to your feelings and opinions and viewpoints, 'Beating the subject to the pulp' in a forum such as this one can be inappropriate and just wrong.
There's a time and place for everything.

I cant even respond eye-to-eye to your comments because I just cant see eye-to-eye.
Maybe I should copy and paste your own words to you and see if you can practice what you so wrongly preached.

Ladies-thanks for all the Fm's. I will respond to only FMs on this subject. This post has worn itself thin.

What a shame.



jennbaby Posted:

Re: C-sections...

Tammy, Thanks, as always, for the informative info. It is greatly appreciated.

Anna
Lee Posted:

Re: C-sections...

I don't want to beat a dead horse here, because I agree with Anna that this post has, unfortunately, worn itself way way too thin, but I cannot stop thinking about this conversation - I've been thinking about it quite a bit since yesterday and as passionate as you are Michele about your birth experience is as passionate as I am about mine. So I ask that everyone just bear with one more post from me to get this off my chest.

I tried yesterday to respond honestly to Melissa's question about the c-sec. To tell the truth, I almost didn't because I had a feeling the thread would degenerate to this and I find it very very unfortunate that most of us are no longer comfortable discussing our c-sec experience in this forum and choose to stick to FM.

Michele, you mentioned in your first post to 'have faith in your body'. Can you see where a comment like this can be upsetting to those of us who had c-secs and never gave it a second thought?

I must tell you that I have never ever been so amazed at what my body can do. I have created and nurtured life. I had faith that my body could do that. I had faith that my body could nurture and then feed my son - and I did. I also had faith that I could deliver this baby the 'normal' way. However, I could not - physically could not. And to that end, I had faith in my doctor. Believe me, I did my research and I hoped against hope that I would not have a c-sec, but my faith in my body was not misplaced, nor did I feel any sense of loss or that I 'missed out on something'. I understand that you do feel that way and you are entitled to your feelings of course. I had faith that the medical staff would see my baby and me through what could have been a tragic situation many years ago.

But please understand that beating this topic to death is not helping. It's not helping those on here who are desperate for ANY birth experience - good, bad, mediocre. You and I and many others on this board know just how lucky we are to be blessed with children - I understand that you are not yet 'over' your birth experience...but for those of us that are (and never even gave it another thought - except as a nice reflection on how far we've come) I for one do not need you going on and on about research in advance and demands to the hospital etc. etc. in a tone that implies that I did something wrong or made some kind of mistake by opting for an immediate c-section with my arms tied down and a catheter inserted and my baby not placed immediately on me, etc. etc.

You said you always 'wanted to give birth'. When you phrase it like that you make it sound like those of us who had c-secs did not 'give birth'. I am personally insulted by that. You did give birth. As did I and many others on this board. Just not naturally. Oh well. Seriously. Oh well. Again, the end result is what matters most to most of us - I never dreamed about my labor, just about my baby. No matter what you say or how you say it, I DID 'give birth'. I am not trying to belittle your feelings, but again belaboring your point is not helping, merely upsetting others.

You point to all the other women out there who feel as you do - well, of course, there are plenty of women who feel as I do...I didn't care how Ryan came out as long as he finally did!! And my husband only cared that we were both safe and healthy and well. Thank you c-section for that!! I know that we are all here to support each other, and I have always been grateful for the support I have received. But your posts on this subject make you sound ungrateful for the blessing of your child -even though I know you are not!! It's the tone and they way they read. Again, that upsets many people here, including myself.

I agree with Anna that I do not think we will ever see eye-to-eye on this issue. What is sad is that there is no longer a comfort zone to discuss c-sections here. We are all mothers or want-to-be mothers. We need to support ALL choices whether we agree with them or not - and not just about birthing methods. We need to be sensitive to others, especially those trying to conceive. I remember how happy I was to hear someone I knew was pregnant but how desperate and sad I felt inside each month when I wasn't. And I would have taken a horrific labor over no baby at all at that point - I still would.

Please do not take this as a personal affront - it is not meant to be so. But just as you needed to get your feelings off your chest, I did too. I have been thinking about it since you first posted your birth story. I was upset then and this post just reaffirmed my feelings. I hope you understand that I do believe you are entitled to your opinion and your feelings and no one, including and especially me, has any right to tell you what or how to feel. I just ask for some consideration for others feelings and possibly a bit more sensitivity. I hope that in time you will be able to work through your issues and accept what is now in your past as what was meant to be - not what you wanted necessarily, but what powers higher than us wanted for you. I believe everything happens to us for a reason...

Hugs to you and your beautiful daughter! Now let the flaming begin...
Imagin916 Posted:

Re: C-sections...


Posted by michele31

I did TONS of reseach on with ICAN which is a c-section support/awareness organization before my surgery. MANY women had their arms routinely tied down. MANY women, including myself, were very upset over the need for a cathadore (sp?) and each women that I personally know that had a c-section needed more help afterwards as compared with women I know who had v-births. Of course, there are many women who have v-births that are difficult too.

Ok, let me point out your first mistake. I commend your efforts to do research, but you are doing them in the WRONG places. There are no fact to any of the info given on these websites. I could go on there and post that its 'more natural' to give birth while standing on your head. Would you believe that? You and these others make all these demands for your birth and have no idea even WHY you want things done this way. Secondly, what is the big deal about the catheter??? Do you think it will damage you for life?? What about when the scapel knicks your full bladder or your bladder ruptures in labor and you are peeing into a bag from your side for the rest of your life?? What about the fact that a distended bladder often impedes labor?? Often once the woman is catheterized, the pushing is easier, and the delivery gets a speed up. C-section moms are surgical patients, and they may need more help initally because of the pain, but Ill tell you point blank: A nice clean scalpel incision is much less painful and heals better than a nasty vaginal tear. There is no disputing this.


While I always appreciate a medical point of view I don't feel it was fair at all to say my information or suggestions were false.

Your information was false, I merely pointed it out.

You can go on the ICAN site and speak to hundreds of womens who discuss these topics.

None of which have any idea what they are talking about, probably none of who are health care professionals. Even if they were, they would not be able to practice like this. They would be stripped of thier medical/nursing license and hospital privledges faster than a bat out of hell. And these are the same women who want home births with a lay midwife because they are 'natural'. Then I see them in my ER 30 minutes later carrying a dead baby while they are bleeding to death. Sad, but true.

I never pretend to be a doctor or nurse or even a healthcare professional but I can tell you that I had to REQUEST my arms not be tied down and at first the doctors and nurses did not like the idea at all. For me this was a huge problem. I couldn't stand the idea of being tied down. For some, it might not be a big deal at all.

If your behavior leading up to this point being that you were very upset about having a c-section led them to believe that you would endanger yourself, baby, or them, than I could see how they would automatically assumed that you would be tied down. If you were going under general anestesia, than this would not be an option, as you would have no control over your hands.

You can also read from hundred of womens that were told that they could never deliver vaginally a certain size baby only to have a VBAC with their next baby, that was even bigger than the first.

This is information that you must have pulled up from 20 years ago. It has been common practice in recent years that many women who have had sections in the past can deliver vaginally, depending on the circumstances and how the incision was made, not on what size the baby is. Sometimes this decision cant be made until the woman goes into labor. If the incision is lateral, a VBAC is possible. If its vertical like it was done 20 years ago, than its not usually possible. And oh yeah, the incision you see on your belly may not be the same direction as the incision on your uterus. That is the one that matters.

Again, I am sure there are exceptions but something to think about.
But I think it is important that patients have know that they can do research and then request what is best for them. Of course, as in ANY medical situation there are emergencies and other issues to deal with.

I agree, you should do research with RELIABLE sources. The sources you are using will tell you not to do this, do that , dont do this excetera. You and these others are presenting us as the enemy, and that we are out to ruin your birthing experience. You dont appreciate our technology, policies and procedures until your requests are leading to big trouble with the baby, and then demand all treatment to reverse all the complications that arouse from refusal of treatmen. You cant back out at the last minute and expect that we can 'fix' it all. Just talk for 5 minutes with my friends that work in neonatal ICU. They have shared thier stories with me about women who refused most treatment, and then had thier baby suffer permanantly for it.

And while I venture to say ALL women are happy and healthy to have a healthy baby having a disappointing birth experience is also something that is very common. It is even discussed in A girlfriend's guide to the first year of motherhood- which is NOT a medical book at all.

Non medical books that discuss womens feelings are one thing. Ones that try to present BS as facts are another.

There are tons of c-section support groups/sites to help women, who like me, feel incomplete. Now many women prefer c-sections and I know that but you might just want to consider another point of view on the subject. I am not alone in my feelings.

You are entitled to your feelings.

I also think hospital policy may be different. I actually had some male resident OB try to do a vaginal exam on me that morning. I told him that I only allow women OBs to exam me plus I didn't even know who the heck he was. When my doctor came in and he told her I wouldn't allow him to do the exam she said, 'But she is having a c-section in a few hours and we KNOW she is not in labor already. She doesn't need one' So even different doctors vary with their policies/procedures.

You misinterpreted the situation. This resident probably didnt know that you werent in labor. If he knew, he wouldnt have attempted to do a vaginal exam. Let me assure you, if you are delivering in a teaching hospital, you are waiving your right to not be seen by a resident, and if you were in fact in labor or the baby was in distress, the doctor that was there would have done it anyway. This has nothing to do with your doctor's policies/procedures. Hospital policy overrides a doctors preferences anyday.

And I didn't see my baby for several minutes because she was being examed behind me and I could hear her crying and people kept telling me how cute Molly was but I couldn't even see her. Now maybe in some places you see the baby earlier than I did, but this is what they did in my hospital.

This is in all hospitals. Our obligation is to make sure that the baby is breathing and circulating. The baby gets APGAR scores at 1 and 5 minutes after birth. This must be done. This takes priority over holding the baby. This would be done regardless of whether or not the baby was a c-section or vaginal delivery. If the baby needs oxygen or resucsitaion, it cant wait the few minutes that you need to bond with baby.


Sorry so long, but I am entitled to my rebuttle just as Michele is.


michele31 Posted:

Re: C-sections...

Lee-By my saying Have Faith In Your Body I meant to tell Melissa not to schedule a c-section out of fear of a large baby- not that your body didn't do something correct. And I ALWAYS write that my c-section feelings are only mine. I wish that I could feel the way you do about it, but I just don't or cannot at this time. I never, ever take away anyone feelings about their birth experience nor did I attack ANYONE in my initial post. I was really trying to give Melissa a bit of the research that I learned from other c/s women and from my doctors. I don't feel as if I gave birth- but I never felt that other women who had c/s didn't give birth. This is a feeling that I have and I don't want any other women to ever feel it too. I am NOT the only women who feels this way about her c/s, but maybe I am the only one on LIW. Sorry if I have offended you. Again, I always say how I feel, not how others should feel.

I also spoke often to the OBs on our site and they never once told me that my info was wrong or false. I was actually VERY calm the day of my surgery. I never once showed signs of being upset or being afraid. The doctor also KNEW I was having surgery since he wanted to make sure I had all of my paperwork for the surgery completed. I cannot comment on why he did what he did, just that he did it. I never once said to put the baby at risk, but most mothers who deliver vaginally hold their child right away, before ASPAR scores are done- correct? Well with a c/s you cannot and that was upsetting to me. You cannot say that ICAN is full of crack pots who come into the ER with dead babies. That is unfair to those women.

I am totally done with talking about this. I will not respond anymore. Someone told me that I am whining too much about my c-section and that others say that too. So fine. I didn't know that my feelings were whining. I thought I was posting in a supportive enviroment with friends. Melissa asked a question and I posted a response. I didn't attack ANYONE or say that anyone's c/s was like mine or that she should feel like I do about it. Yet this is what happened.
elle Posted:

Re: C-sections...

After reading all the posts here -- I was not even going to touch this -- but I have to .
Everyone's experience is and will be different.
Everyones body will respond differently to pregnancy and birth-- whats right for one person may be wrong for another. The key thing is -- In this day and age-- We as women are SO fortunate to have the medical care available -- so we can have healthy babies. Years ago-- if it came to a mother needing a c-section-- chances are the baby would die or the mother would. Now they are safe and routine! I had Aidan vaginally-- and he fractured his skull during the vacum extraction... He had to be in the nicu for 8 days -- AND I was so torn ' down there' I could barely go to the bathroom. Yes -- it sucked and was not what I planned-- But all I could think about was What if the Dr's were not there. I had to be catherterized-- and my epidural ran out -- but my son would have DIED if it were not for the medical intervention that was done. I am so thankful they got him out however they had to ..And I'll do it again if needed.
jennbaby Posted:

Re: C-sections...


Posted by elle

I am so thankful they got him out however they had to ..And I'll do it again if needed.


Elle, thanks for sharing.
I am sorry you had a rough *delivery* but your words mean alot!

I am so thankful they got him out however they had to ..And I'll do it again if needed.
RichsBride Posted:

Re: C-sections...

well as usual I am coming in late on this & some of may have given up on this heated thread already, But I thought I'd share my story with you Melissa.

I also had an emergancy c-section @ 36 weeks. And I have to say that it was painless, I recovered very quickly & as the years have passed I can hardly even notice my scar.
I am a firm believer in only being able to controll your destiny to a point and the rest is what's meant to be. I know that every mother has a different vision of how her birth experience should be & I'm not trying to disagree with anyone's opinions.
But here's my story(which I rarely tell)if you'd like more stories.
First I was barely 17 years old-unmarried, my son was almost 4 weeks early & it was 4th of July weekend & my parents were on a boating trip. My water broke in the shower @ around 10:30am, started labor a little while later, but didn't think it was labor. I thought something was wrong-since I had weeks left to go. My friend who was 18 came & picked me up & we went to StonyBrook & started to try to get in touch with my doctor. There was no hope of getting touch with my parents since 17 years ago nobody had cell phones that worked in the ocean.
Turns out my OB was 'away'
so I meet some young Dr for the first time & he says I'm dialated 7cm, I'm in full labor & my baby is breech. They offer to call a specialist to turn him around...while we were waiting for that my heart rate dropped, then the baby's heart dropped within 15 minutes they decided he was in distress & they said you need a c-section & general anesthesia. (Like MichelleW)
The ONLY thought that went through my head was get him out as quickly & safely as possible. I remember looking at the clock on the wall in OR & it said 6:25 pm-my son was born at 6:32pm.....perfectly healthy.
I slept for several hours. By the way I had been lactating for 4 weeks prior to birth so do not think you won't have milk-you might have plenty.
I want to tell a bit more if you're not bored to death & that is MY feeling on bonding after CS.
Because I was 17 & my mother nor MY Dr were there my son was put in the nursery & I was moved to a non maternity floor.
The reason being that 17 years ago MOST teenage mothers gave their children up & its easier if you don't see the baby. When I woke up there was a social worker sitting next to me handing me papers about adoption...........I never told anyone I was interested in this-it was just how things were done at that time. I will tell you that my son was about 15 hours old before I held him because they were keeping me away from him. (I had chosen not to BF all along)
By that time my parents & doctor had finally arrived and things were handled differently.
I do not feel short changed by my experience because my son spent almost 9 months living inside me & I have spent my entire life caring for him. We could not be more intertwinded & in love with eachother.
Every step you take is part of the journey and for those of you here with older children you will agree that the birth is one of the tiny steps it takes to have a wonderful experience.
We are planning on TTC in the next year or so & if I can have a vaginal birth I will, if not I will feel blessed to have another healthy child.
Just one more thing-no two mothers have had the exact experience, as long as the end result is a healthy mother & child then I feel that is the way it was meant to be.
good luck to you melissa-sorry it was so long

Reply to this topic

Log in to reply or quote a post.