Search in your own words. Describe what you need or ask a wedding planning question.
Posted by julz33
-The point of marriage is to produce children. gay marriage is not natural biologically.
Posted by tracyg
Posted by julz33
-The point of marriage is to produce children. gay marriage is not natural biologically.
I am for it.
But this arguement REALLY pisses me off! Makes no sense. If a man or woman in a couple is unable to have children, does that mean THEY should not get married either?? So stupid.
Posted by julz33
Posted by tracyg
Posted by julz33
-The point of marriage is to produce children. gay marriage is not natural biologically.
I am for it.
But this arguement REALLY pisses me off! Makes no sense. If a man or woman in a couple is unable to have children, does that mean THEY should not get married either?? So stupid.
Or what about a man and woman who choose not to have children? Why should they be allowed to marry then?
Posted by julz33
Posted by tracyg
Posted by julz33
-The point of marriage is to produce children. gay marriage is not natural biologically.
I am for it.
But this arguement REALLY pisses me off! Makes no sense. If a man or woman in a couple is unable to have children, does that mean THEY should not get married either?? So stupid.
Or what about a man and woman who choose not to have children? Why should they be allowed to marry then?
Posted by JimmysBride
Posted by julz33
Posted by tracyg
Posted by julz33
-The point of marriage is to produce children. gay marriage is not natural biologically.
I am for it.
But this arguement REALLY pisses me off! Makes no sense. If a man or woman in a couple is unable to have children, does that mean THEY should not get married either?? So stupid.
Or what about a man and woman who choose not to have children? Why should they be allowed to marry then?
Actually, the church sorta makes you 'promise' that you DO want to have children before they'll marry you. So technically, in the eyes of the church, if you don't WANT to have children, you shouldn't be getting married.
Posted by tracyg
Posted by JimmysBride
Posted by julz33
Posted by tracyg
Posted by julz33
-The point of marriage is to produce children. gay marriage is not natural biologically.
I am for it.
But this arguement REALLY pisses me off! Makes no sense. If a man or woman in a couple is unable to have children, does that mean THEY should not get married either?? So stupid.
Or what about a man and woman who choose not to have children? Why should they be allowed to marry then?
Actually, the church sorta makes you 'promise' that you DO want to have children before they'll marry you. So technically, in the eyes of the church, if you don't WANT to have children, you shouldn't be getting married.
thats just the Catholic church, as far as I know. my religion doesn't do that
This is a topic that honestly confuses me! I cant give an honest answer because I have feelings both ways. I agree that if two people love each other than whether it is two men or two woman or a heterosexual couple it shouldn't matter. My uncle was gay and a very dear friend is gay but growing up in todays society kinda clouds the situation for some like myself. I feel very uncomfortable seeing two of the same sex being intimate with each other however without that element it has never seemed to bother me. Like I said Im very confused about it but this is me being honest not claiming that I don't have a problem with it because I have friends or relatives that are. FH aunt is in a relationship with another woman and they have recently adopted a little boy and I think that is great only because this was a baby who had no one and now all that matters is that he has two people who love him very much! I also could not answer honestly how I would feel if one of my children were gay because right now I think it would bother me because of my religion and society but if it were to actually happen I couldnt imagine not being a part of their life because I was confused with it. JMHO
If two people are in love, why shouldn't they be able to take it to the next level? I have heard the idiotic argument that if we let gays marry, then will people be able to marry their animals? Yeah because gay couples are on the same level of animals. Idiots.
Posted by antoinette72
I feel very uncomfortable seeing two of the same sex being intimate with each other however without that element it has never seemed to bother me.
I can't believe that this is even still an issue...I feel like it would solve so many other issues if marriage was allowed. It would not force gay people to marry into opposite sex relationships, leading to infidelity, disease,and heartache.
I think the people who said they are opposed to it seems like a surprisingly low number to me. I don't know, maybe I come across a lot of people against it in real life?
My opinion is that if its your life you should be able to live it the best way that you feel like meaning I respect it because I wouldn't want no else telling how to live my life.
Posted by t
If you need the comfort and support of an individual of the same sex fine, but marriage in my opinion is for opposite sexes. You do not need marriage to prove you love one another. its just a piece of paper.
, cause I did not see a point. Again, just my opinion.
again its my opinion. Why heterosexual couples want the piece of paper I do not know I can not answer for people. I could do with out it and there are many other people who can to. After 7 yrs in NY its called common-law, for heterosexual couples. The reason we got our piece of paper was our family is old fashioned and from the other country.
Well, I think only by marriage can a person put their significant other on their health insurance, etc. It seems only fair. Some of these gay couples have adopted children together and have a family unit, so I don't see why they should be denied that.
Violet in that sense I agree, but other then that I jsut dont feel right about it.
