Post New Topic

The difference (calligraphy versus label)

Original post by suven

I'm NOT trying to be a jerk, it's just that I've seen it posted A LOT where people want to know if it's a big deal to do calligraphy, hand write, computer print, or do labels on invites.

I am not posting my opinion, but here are 2 invitations that we recently received.
2581114_3.jpg
Blu-ize Posted:

Re: The difference (calligraphy versus label)

I had laser calligraphy (printed) and years ago when that was not an option we used hand calligraphy. I like either option. I had the laser calligraphy of course the laser calligraphy is less expensive, but the clear labels in my opinion is something I see when I do mailings at work and not for a formal invite or thank you for that matter.

stephanief Posted:

Re: The difference (calligraphy versus label)

I'm going to print the envelopes from my computer and use a caligraphy type font. It will come out nicely
Beth1210 Posted:

Re: The difference (calligraphy versus label)

I think you should do what makes you happy

I am paying over $2.00 to have my envelopes printed with matching font to the invites

Could I do it myself- maybe
Do I have the time- not really

I am spending so much on invites- I just want to look great!

edited to say- I am sure no one I am inviting even cares- it's for me- to make me happy
Nadia Posted:

Re: The difference (calligraphy versus label)


Posted by Blu-ize

I had laser calligraphy (printed) and years ago when that was not an option we used hand calligraphy. I like either option. I had the laser calligraphy of course the laser calligraphy is less expensive, but the clear labels in my opinion is something I see when I do mailings at work and not for a formal invite or thank you for that matter.



I agree with you.
jes81276 Posted:

Re: The difference (calligraphy versus label)


Posted by Beth1210

I think you should do what makes you happy

I am paying over $2.00 to have my envelopes printed with matching font to the invites

Could I do it myself- maybe
Do I have the time- not really

I am spending so much on invites- I just want to look great!

edited to say- I am sure no one I am inviting even cares- it's for me- to make me happy




I agree w/you 100% - who cares if the envelope just gets ripped open and no one looks at the writing....I will be happy when I am stuffing the damn things!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
leighdvm Posted:

Re: The difference (calligraphy versus label)

I've seen caligraphy fonts printed on envelopes and do not think they look cheap at all. My wedding is a formal affair. If someone will actually run their fingers over the address to see if they are engraved or not, has a serious problem and needs to get a life.

lullabella Posted:

Re: The difference (calligraphy versus label)

I am not crazy about labels for wedding invites.... Calligraphy is sooooooo much nicer. I prefer hand written but I would take computer over labels.

SeptWed Posted:

Re: The difference (calligraphy versus label)


Posted by DUCKS2001

u can print it on the envelope without a label from your comp. looks the same.



This is what i did and they came out amazing. Take much longer to do though then labels.
melissaandsean Posted:

Re: The difference (calligraphy versus label)

I don't think it's really about 'keeping the envelope'. Or the fact that people will throw it away. They will throw away your entire invitation eventually, so does that mean you can send them a post-it note with your wedding info??

For me, it's more about the formality of the event. If it's a birthday party, go for labels. If it's an elegant affair, and you have a beautiful invitation, calligraphy is a nice finishing touch.
FallBride05 Posted:

Re: The difference (calligraphy versus label)

I'm having a huge wedding, so caligraphy for me was not an option (just too expensive for all those invites!).

My FFIL is doing them for me on his computer, and I have to say they look beautiful!
Thumballina Posted:

Re: The difference (calligraphy versus label)


Posted by leighdvm

If someone will actually run their fingers over the address to see if they are engraved or not, has a serious problem and needs to get a life.



I agree
to think that someones wedding is 'less formal' because their invitations are not engraved is very snobbish and pretentious
brooklynbridezilla Posted:

Re: The difference (calligraphy versus label)

I think calligraphy is beautiful, but I view it as an extra I can do with out. I would rather put my $ elsewhere.

If any of our guests think less of us, our wedding and our marraige because we chose not to have it, they can go to hell.
CJStein Posted:

Re: The difference (calligraphy versus label)

To each his own, if you want to use labels, go for it, if you want to have your invites addressed with calligraphy, go for it.

Bottom line, if someone is passing judgement on you and your wedding b/c of it, that's ridiculous. Same goes if you pass judgement on someone b/c of clear labeled invites. I find myself getting wrapped up in all of this wedding competition (this one was better, this wedding was horrible, I want mine to be nicer, etc) and I have to take a step back and remind myself that it's a wedding, a happy day, it shouldn't be so dramatic. Be happy for the couple getting married.
VS11 Posted:

Re: The difference (calligraphy versus label)

It has nothing to do with who is better or who is having a better wedding...

I chose to do what I am doing with our wedding for us,, not anyone else.

Would I think less of the couple if I received an invitation with a clear label, NO!!!!

But me personally, I would not address the envelope with a clear label, especially for our wedding. And that is becasue I made that decision..not because I am looking to show up another bride...

I do feel there are other alternatives to address a wedding ivnitation and also keep the cost down. Printing the address directly on the envelope is one of them...it just takes more time.


amstellitelady Posted:

Re: The difference (calligraphy versus label)


Posted by kase21

Honestly, I think the Calligraphy looks nice, but it's a total waste - who keeps the envelope? I don't even keep the invite! I would look for a great font and print on the envelope. It's cheaper and can at least be customized to your style... not everyone is a Calligraphy kind of couple. With all the money we spend on weddings, you should save the calligraphy $$ and treat yourself to a day at the spa! If Mom or whoever wants a special envelope, then get a couple done so those people have it and move along. Or if you have money to burn, do what makes you happy!

I don't see the big deal about the state. So it's abbreviated... and what? As long as it gets to you, it should be ok.

I think that we adhere a little too closely to old traditions (some that just aren't practical for some people) and it's unfair to hold everyone to your standard, simply because you chose to do something a particular way.

JMO



Well said I totally agree with you
diamondgrlie Posted:

Re: The difference (calligraphy versus label)

I dont know if I missed this point in this thread but there is a difference in computer calligraphy and the labels. It doesnt need to be hand written I guess but I have seen calligraphy done by computer and it looked very nice. I probably would have done that myself if I didnt have a friend who does calligraphy.

CJStein Posted:

Re: The difference (calligraphy versus label)


Posted by CJStein

To each his own, if you want to use labels, go for it, if you want to have your invites addressed with calligraphy, go for it.

Bottom line, if someone is passing judgement on you and your wedding b/c of it, that's ridiculous. Same goes if you pass judgement on someone b/c of clear labeled invites. I find myself getting wrapped up in all of this wedding competition (this one was better, this wedding was horrible, I want mine to be nicer, etc) and I have to take a step back and remind myself that it's a wedding, a happy day, it shouldn't be so dramatic. Be happy for the couple getting married.



ETA: when I am talking about the wedding competition thing, I'm referencing myself, not anyone else on this thread.
Goldi1021 Posted:

Re: The difference (calligraphy versus label)

I am hardly in competetion with anyone in regard to making or planning a wedding. I am the last of my friends and cousins to get married. I think that everyone is entitled to do as they see fit for their own wedding. There are those people who see having engraved invitations and hand calligraphy as unnecessary, obnoxious or pretentious. There are plenty of people, myself included, that feel they are part of the vision of THEIR ideal wedding. If MY idea of setting the tone for a formal wedding is an engraved invitation with hand calligraphy on the inside and outside envelopes, is pretentious, then honk my hooters I am one heck of a snob.

stephanief Posted:

Re: The difference (calligraphy versus label)


Posted by Goldi1021

I am hardly in competetion with anyone in regard to making or planning a wedding. I am the last of my friends and cousins to get married. I think that everyone is entitled to do as they see fit for their own wedding. There are those people who see having engraved invitations and hand calligraphy as unnecessary, obnoxious or pretentious. There are plenty of people, myself included, that feel they are part of the vision of THEIR ideal wedding. If MY idea of setting the tone for a formal wedding is an engraved invitation with hand calligraphy on the inside and outside envelopes, is pretentious, then honk my hooters I am one heck of a snob.



OK, seriously, this has gotten out of hand. Bottom line, do what you want, no one will care or remember except you. It is your day and if Caligraphy is what floats your boat, so be it.
VS11 Posted:

Re: The difference (calligraphy versus label)


Posted by Goldi1021

I am hardly in competetion with anyone in regard to making or planning a wedding. I am the last of my friends and cousins to get married. I think that everyone is entitled to do as they see fit for their own wedding. There are those people who see having engraved invitations and hand calligraphy as unnecessary, obnoxious or pretentious. There are plenty of people, myself included, that feel they are part of the vision of THEIR ideal wedding. If MY idea of setting the tone for a formal wedding is an engraved invitation with hand calligraphy on the inside and outside envelopes, is pretentious, then honk my hooters I am one heck of a snob.







toot toot!!!!!!!!!!

Reply to this topic

Log in to reply or quote a post.