Search in your own words. Describe what you need or ask a wedding planning question.
We're having a debate here, I want to know what most people think is the most appropriate to offer.
I chose the 2nd option, because I find a lot of people have a very strong aversion to lamb.
I personally love lamb, but I know people who don't like red meat or fish so if there wasn't a chicken option they'd be annoyed.
I'm definitely going steak, chicken, and a fish even though we also have lamb as an option for an entree. We're going to choose the baby lambs as an h'orderve during the cocktail hour and there will also be a carving station.
Second...it's best to have a variety of choices. I went to a wedding where the only menu choices were fish and game poultry, and I ended up begging for chicken fingers from the childrens menu. Not good!
2nd option-not everyone will eat the meat so you should offer a chicken option.
I pick # 2 also. It is always safe to have a chicken dish
Def. the 2nd option.
I personally LOVE lamb chops! But option #2 is the best as it provides a 'one of each' option for your guests.
#2 def.!
option #2 every loves chicken
Posted by HSsweethearts
I think the 2nd is more appropriate. Some people don't eat red meat and also a lot of people don't like sea bass. It's not exatly a safe fish choice, so I'd opt for the chicken.
I may be biased though since I will not serve any lamb or veal at my wedding
I'd say the second, because lamb is one of those things that many people just hate. There's usually a lot of plain people who just want the chicken!
Posted by allegracristina
Posted by HSsweethearts
I think the 2nd is more appropriate. Some people don't eat red meat and also a lot of people don't like sea bass. It's not exatly a safe fish choice, so I'd opt for the chicken.
I may be biased though since I will not serve any lamb or veal at my wedding
Chilean Sea Bass is actually an excellent choice for a fish. It's white, not very overwhelming in taste, and has a very meat-like texture. Salmon, (which I love) has a much 'fishier' taste, and is much more fatty, which many people don't like. If your RH offers it, try it in your tasting! You may be surprised! We had it at our tasting and I was blown away! It was a part of our menu.![]()
![]()
I think the second one because not everyone eats fish,beaf or lamb alot of people eat chicken
u need a chicken option...
Posted by HSsweethearts
Posted by allegracristina
Posted by HSsweethearts
I think the 2nd is more appropriate. Some people don't eat red meat and also a lot of people don't like sea bass. It's not exatly a safe fish choice, so I'd opt for the chicken.
I may be biased though since I will not serve any lamb or veal at my wedding
Chilean Sea Bass is actually an excellent choice for a fish. It's white, not very overwhelming in taste, and has a very meat-like texture. Salmon, (which I love) has a much 'fishier' taste, and is much more fatty, which many people don't like. If your RH offers it, try it in your tasting! You may be surprised! We had it at our tasting and I was blown away! It was a part of our menu.![]()
![]()
I think Sea Bass is on our menu (but we have 8 choices), but it makes me gag. I hate it so so much. I'd much rather have tilapia or mahi Mahi
