Search in your own words. Describe what you need or ask a wedding planning question.
Posted by don424
if she was still breathing when she passed out, then yes, the feeding tube should have been given
if the heart and lungs stopped, then no
Posted by RedHead
Posted by don424
But Don..then under this line of thinking..when she passed out should the feeding tube NEVER have been placed in?
Shold we never use any extrodinary means to keep someone or save someone...SINCE that is MAN deciding that it isn't time for the person to die?
if she was still breathing when she passed out, then yes, the feeding tube should have been given
if the heart and lungs stopped, then no
Posted by nov04LIbride
Posted by don424
if she was still breathing when she passed out, then yes, the feeding tube should have been given
if the heart and lungs stopped, then no
So do you believe that in a hospital electric shocks should not be administered when a patient's heart stops beating? The doctors should not attempt to resussitate?
Posted by don424
i am sure when the first incident happened, everyone was so shocked that emotion overode logic.
It's easy to sit back and say she should have been let go.
When you're in the initial shock, it's hard to think rationally
In fact it will always be done unless a person has a DNR!
Posted by RedHead
Posted by don424
i am sure when the first incident happened, everyone was so shocked that emotion overode logic.
It's easy to sit back and say she should have been let go.
When you're in the initial shock, it's hard to think rationally
well that is common practice actually...Our society doesn't let people just die. They start CPR immediately and extrodinary means are used ASAP.
Posted by don424
Posted by RedHead
Posted by don424
i am sure when the first incident happened, everyone was so shocked that emotion overode logic.
It's easy to sit back and say she should have been let go.
When you're in the initial shock, it's hard to think rationally
well that is common practice actually...Our society doesn't let people just die. They start CPR immediately and extrodinary means are used ASAP.
you can't fault that
Posted by RedHead
Posted by don424
Posted by RedHead
Posted by don424
i am sure when the first incident happened, everyone was so shocked that emotion overode logic.
It's easy to sit back and say she should have been let go.
When you're in the initial shock, it's hard to think rationally
well that is common practice actually...Our society doesn't let people just die. They start CPR immediately and extrodinary means are used ASAP.
in her case, you can make an exception, she was young
you can't fault that
but YOU can....
AND according to you and your line of thought ...this should NOT be done!
AND hence Terri would have died a decade ago...
Posted by RedHead
Posted by bedda26
I guess in sickness and health means nothing too. Oh no wait it does to Mr. Schiavo he did dedicate some years in taking of her....what a saint, they should name a street after him.
Maybe the vows should be changed to 'In sickness and in health and when brain dead stop taking care of them and move on with your life'...Marriage is a LIFETIME committment, it's not a committment until the person gets brain damaged.
see now those were silly silly comments![]()
unless you lived it you really shouldn't pass judgement
Posted by don424
if she was still breathing when she passed out, then yes, the feeding tube should have been given
if the heart and lungs stopped, then no
Posted by bedda26
I have the right to say what I want. It's my opinion and it's how I feel about the man and the whole situation.
Back at ya....![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Posted by don424
we can go back and forth on this all day
you're not changing my opinion and i'm not changing yours
there is no right or wrong here
Posted by don424
we can go back and forth on this all day
you're not changing my opinion and i'm not changing yours
there is no right or wrong here
Posted by bedda26
Posted by don424
we can go back and forth on this all day
you're not changing my opinion and i'm not changing yours
there is no right or wrong here
Tell that to the people who call my comments silly. But you are right Don.
Posted by don424
we can go back and forth on this all day
you're not changing my opinion and i'm not changing yours
there is no right or wrong here
Posted by bedda26
Posted by don424
we can go back and forth on this all day
you're not changing my opinion and i'm not changing yours
there is no right or wrong here
Tell that to the people who call my comments silly. But you are right Don.
Posted by MonkeyLuv
Posted by don424
we can go back and forth on this all day
you're not changing my opinion and i'm not changing yours
there is no right or wrong here
So the minute someone challenges you and calls your logic faulty you shut down and revert to 'we have to agree to disagree' rather than attempt to back up your statements with facts and reason.
That defeats the entire point of a debate, doesn't it?
Posted by don424
but this debate has been going on for like 2 days already...all of my opinions have been stated and backed up multiple times
i was challenged yesterday and backed up my feelings for an entire day
Posted by RedHead
Posted by don424
but this debate has been going on for like 2 days already...all of my opinions have been stated and backed up multiple times
i was challenged yesterday and backed up my feelings for an entire day
me too...and like you said...peoples point of view will not change...even though i hope they do![]()
![]()
